tagheurs-v-the-bounty-hub-et-al

Mayflower District Court

#tagheurs-v-the-bounty-hub-et-al

This is the start of #tagheurs-v-the-bounty-hub-et-al channel.

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-25 11:33 a.m.

New Case

tagheurs v. The Bounty Hub, et al.

Case Type

civil

Case Number

CV-361-25

clerkFlow pinned a message to this channel.2025-08-28 07:33 p.m.

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-25 11:34 a.m.

Channel Permissions Synced

Permissions have been synced to Chambers of Hon’ble Judge Singhski.

Nicklaus used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-25 11:34 a.m.

Case Modified

@Nicklaus

has added @ian to the case channel.

Nicklaus 2025-07-25 11:34 a.m.

@singhski

@ian

ian 2025-07-25 11:52 a.m.

@singhski

hello singhski

ian 2025-07-25 11:52 a.m.

I have a petition for an EPo

ian 2025-07-25 11:52 a.m.

emergency

ian 2025-07-25 11:52 a.m.

I was hoping we could do a REALLY quick hearing where we can swear under oath because I dont feel like doing an affidavit

ian 2025-07-25 11:52 a.m.

Ill also present the evidence more concisely

ian 2025-07-25 11:53 a.m.

I have the actual petition tho as a document

singhski 2025-07-25 11:53 a.m.

Do you want a hearing quickly?

ian 2025-07-25 11:53 a.m.

yes

singhski 2025-07-25 11:53 a.m.

Join game

singhski 2025-07-25 11:54 a.m.

@AlbertBlackwell

if you could also join to record

singhski 2025-07-25 11:54 a.m.

Main server

singhski

Join game

ian 2025-07-25 11:54 a.m.

great

ian 2025-07-25 12:09 p.m.

@singhski

thats the petition

ian 2025-07-25 12:09 p.m.

evidence and affidavit missing, we'll present during hearing

singhski

@AlbertBlackwell if you could also join to record

AlbertBlackwell 2025-07-25 12:13 p.m.

yes

AlbertBlackwell 2025-07-25 12:13 p.m.

coming

AlbertBlackwell 2025-07-25 12:14 p.m.

AlbertBlackwell 2025-07-25 12:16 p.m.

@singhski

AlbertBlackwell

@singhski

singhski 2025-07-25 12:17 p.m.

Thank you, let me know when you are in, I will send a unit to you.

singhski

Thank you, let me know when you are in, I will send a unit to you.

AlbertBlackwell 2025-07-25 12:18 p.m.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGUORSB1V14

YouAreDirt

HELP IS ON THE WAY, DEAR!

HELP IS ON THE WAAAY!

singhski 2025-07-25 12:30 p.m.

@AlbertBlackwell

ETA?

singhski

@AlbertBlackwell ETA?

AlbertBlackwell 2025-07-25 12:31 p.m.

err my game is missing most of the guis and stuff

AlbertBlackwell 2025-07-25 12:31 p.m.

AlbertBlackwell

err my game is missing most of the guis and stuff

singhski 2025-07-25 12:31 p.m.

Where are you

singhski

Where are you

AlbertBlackwell 2025-07-25 12:31 p.m.

msp barracks

AlbertBlackwell 2025-07-25 12:49 p.m.

25/07/2025 - IN-GAME HEARING COMMENCED 17:49 GMT

ian 2025-07-25 01:02 p.m.

https://gyazo.com/3a7c4e5f7e7024ddedc9169f37436d56

@singhski

Gyazo Screen Video

ian 2025-07-25 01:03 p.m.

singhski 2025-07-25 01:11 p.m.

@ian

@tagheurs

@steva

After coming to the realization that this is heavily tied to Springykfc's 2025 Ridgeway gubernatorial run, I will have to recuse, because I am his lawyer in Ridgeway. I wish to avoid the appearance of impropriety. For this reason, the hearing has also been cancelled.

ian 2025-07-25 01:13 p.m.

I understand

AlbertBlackwell 2025-07-25 01:13 p.m.

25/07/2025 - IN-GAME HEARING CONCLUDED 18:10 GMT

ian 2025-07-25 01:14 p.m.

Theres two more of these

ian

I understand

singhski 2025-07-25 01:14 p.m.

Just so you understand, I thought that the actions were completely unrelated to his campaign

singhski 2025-07-25 01:14 p.m.

there are multiple Mayflower operations in Ridgeway

singhski

Just so you understand, I thought that the actions were completely unrelated to his campaign

ian 2025-07-25 01:14 p.m.

No, I do, I agree that they are

ian 2025-07-25 01:14 p.m.

It's better that you recuse—we avoid a duly processed appeal in due time

ian 2025-07-25 01:15 p.m.

Everything needs to be done right

ian 2025-07-25 01:15 p.m.

I ask this be reassigned and re-heard at the earliest convenience of the court

ian 2025-07-25 01:42 p.m.

cc @Nicklaus

ian 2025-07-25 01:55 p.m.

@Nicklaus

hey

ian 2025-07-25 02:05 p.m.

@Nicklaus

ian

cc @Nicklaus

krm 2025-07-25 03:02 p.m.

Reassigned to @Richo

krm

Reassigned to @Richo

ian 2025-07-25 03:30 p.m.

Reassign please

User

Message could not be loaded.

ian 2025-07-25 03:33 p.m.

ian 2025-07-25 03:34 p.m.

@krm

ian 2025-07-25 03:34 p.m.

Please reassign

ian 2025-07-25 03:34 p.m.

Rummy, or a magistrate

ian 2025-07-25 03:34 p.m.

Preferably a magistrate would be best

ian 2025-07-25 03:34 p.m.

@vloqsouls

GREAT case for you .

ian 2025-07-25 03:38 p.m.

@Nicklaus

this is an EMERGENCY petition

ian 2025-07-25 03:38 p.m.

Its supposed to be a priority over sado's suits

krm 2025-07-25 03:42 p.m.

You asked for a reassignment and got one @ian

Richo 2025-07-25 03:52 p.m.

ian

@Nicklaus this is an EMERGENCY petition

Richo 2025-07-25 03:52 p.m.

Reading

Richo 2025-07-25 03:53 p.m.

Post anything relevant to your emergency @ian

krm

You asked for a reassignment and got one @ian

ian 2025-07-25 03:54 p.m.

This judge is biased toward me

ian 2025-07-25 03:54 p.m.

Additionally his docket is cloesd

ian 2025-07-25 03:55 p.m.

Please get me another judge hastily

ian 2025-07-25 03:58 p.m.

Im sure @andysofun would love to take this

ian 2025-07-25 03:58 p.m.

or @bommes

bommes 2025-07-25 04:35 p.m.

I used to work for you. 99% sure that’s unethical

bommes

I used to work for you. 99% sure that’s unethical

ian 2025-07-25 04:46 p.m.

are you serious

ian 2025-07-25 04:46 p.m.

half of the people here worked for each other

ian 2025-07-25 04:47 p.m.

you cant honestly believe taking a case of a former boss is unethical

ian 2025-07-25 07:03 p.m.

@krm

reassign to somebody else please

ian 2025-07-25 07:03 p.m.

ANY of the magistrates

ian 2025-07-25 07:03 p.m.

Judge isnt even needed this is a simple EPO matter

ian 2025-07-25 07:03 p.m.

After the EPO the case is archived

ian 2025-07-25 07:41 p.m.

@Nicklaus

ian 2025-07-25 07:41 p.m.

@krm

ian 2025-07-25 07:41 p.m.

@Nicklaus

ian 2025-07-25 07:41 p.m.

@krm

ian 2025-07-25 07:41 p.m.

@andysofun

do you want this case

ian 2025-07-25 07:41 p.m.

so simple

ian 2025-07-25 07:41 p.m.

EPO

AlbertBlackwell 2025-07-25 07:42 p.m.

@ian

i will hear it

ian

Additionally his docket is cloesd

Nicklaus 2025-07-25 07:46 p.m.

Then how is it assigned to him

Nicklaus 2025-07-25 07:47 p.m.

If you feel the judge is biased you may go through the normal route of seeking recusal

Nicklaus 2025-07-25 07:47 p.m.

Reassigning a case is outside my authority except where ordered by a District Judge

Nicklaus

Then how is it assigned to him

ian 2025-07-25 07:47 p.m.

Ministerial mistake

ian 2025-07-25 07:47 p.m.

Reassign

andysofun 2025-07-25 07:56 p.m.

a judge would have to assign this matter to me

Nicklaus

Reassigning a case is outside my authority except where ordered by a District Judge

ian 2025-07-25 07:59 p.m.

"ORDERED Judge RichoCornwall DOCKET CLOSED"

ian 2025-07-25 07:59 p.m.

Are we for real

ian 2025-07-25 07:59 p.m.

Literally says ORDERED

Nicklaus 2025-07-25 08:00 p.m.

@krm

Nicklaus 2025-07-25 08:00 p.m.

Please refer all complaints to the Supervising Justice of the Mayflower District Court for the County of Clark

krm 2025-07-25 08:01 p.m.

@Xiqaq

krm 2025-07-25 08:01 p.m.

That is him

Nicklaus

Please refer all complaints to the Supervising Justice of the Mayflower District Court for the County of Clark

ian 2025-07-25 08:04 p.m.

This is not a complaint

ian 2025-07-25 08:04 p.m.

I am telling you that you assigned this in the wrong docket

ian 2025-07-25 08:05 p.m.

Redress it by assigning it to a correct one

ian 2025-07-25 08:05 p.m.

ANY magistrate, or a judge that's actually available

ian 2025-07-25 08:05 p.m.

This is an EMERGENCY MATTER god's sakes

Nicklaus 2025-07-25 08:08 p.m.

# NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT

THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED MATTER, HAVING COME BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE SINGHSKI AND DISTRICT JUDGE SINGHSKI HAVING RECUSED, HAVING COME BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE RICHOCORNWALL AND DISTRICT JUDGE RICHOCORNWALL HAVING AN ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED DOCKET, SHALL BE REASSIGNED TO DISTRICT JUDGE INSERTREALITY.

(edited)

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-25 08:09 p.m.

Channel Permissions Synced

Permissions have been synced to Chambers of Judge insertreality.

Nicklaus used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-25 08:09 p.m.

Case Modified

@Nicklaus

has added @ian to the case channel.

Nicklaus 2025-07-25 08:09 p.m.

@mike_bn

@ian

Nicklaus

@mike_bn

@ian

ian 2025-07-25 08:13 p.m.

Thank you

ian 2025-07-25 08:13 p.m.

@mike_bn

Hello Y'r H'n'r, this is an urgent emergency protection matter

ian 2025-07-25 08:14 p.m.

Please schedule a hearing at your EARLIEST convenience to allow us to state our case for relief

ian 2025-07-25 08:15 p.m.

The petition is attached herein (somewhere), but the presentation of Petitioner's testimony (which is required for an EPO) as well as the evidence is not included as it is reserved for the hearing

ian

@singhski thats the petition

ian 2025-07-25 08:15 p.m.

@Nicklaus

can you pin this

Nicklaus pinned a message to this channel.2025-08-28 07:33 p.m.

ian 2025-07-25 08:20 p.m.

@Nicklaus

ok but actually

ian 2025-07-25 08:20 p.m.

This is an emergency matter

ian 2025-07-25 08:20 p.m.

The proper thing is to assign it to a judge that is on call and online now

ian 2025-07-25 08:21 p.m.

So we can do this urgent thing now and not later

ian 2025-07-25 08:21 p.m.

Nomadity for example

ian 2025-07-25 08:21 p.m.

Or a magistrate

ian 2025-07-25 08:21 p.m.

No issue with insert but I think he'll take a ling time

Nicklaus 2025-07-25 08:30 p.m.

no judge is on call brochacho

Nicklaus 2025-07-25 08:30 p.m.

you've been to 3 judges

Nicklaus

you've been to 3 judges

ian 2025-07-25 08:31 p.m.

One recused voluntarily, one is the worst and most inactive judge in clark history and had his docket closed, and the other is not online

Nicklaus

no judge is on call brochacho

ian 2025-07-25 08:32 p.m.

Literally any judge that is online

ian 2025-07-25 08:32 p.m.

Nomadity is online

ian 2025-07-25 08:32 p.m.

Actually

ian 2025-07-25 08:32 p.m.

@mike_bn

are you on rn?

ian 2025-07-25 08:57 p.m.

@Nicklaus

ian 2025-07-25 08:57 p.m.

Please new judge

honkhonk 2025-07-25 09:05 p.m.

What is the Emergency

honkhonk 2025-07-25 09:05 p.m.

@ian

honkhonk

What is the Emergency

ian 2025-07-25 09:07 p.m.

My client has a bounty on his head

ian 2025-07-25 09:07 p.m.

He cannot join the game without being targeted

ian 2025-07-25 09:08 p.m.

We need to have an EPO granted and for that we need a hearing with a judge who is online and can attend to it as hastily as possible

ian 2025-07-25 09:08 p.m.

Nomadity is online. I bet he can do it

honkhonk 2025-07-25 09:10 p.m.

Against who

honkhonk

Against who

ian 2025-07-25 09:11 p.m.

The Bounty Hub

ian 2025-07-25 09:11 p.m.

Orangebear 22

ian 2025-07-25 09:11 p.m.

And DownSurge

ian 2025-07-25 09:11 p.m.

All three of em

honkhonk 2025-07-25 09:12 p.m.

"The Bounty Hub" ?

honkhonk 2025-07-25 09:12 p.m.

a whole discord?

ian 2025-07-25 09:12 p.m.

A criminal organization

ian 2025-07-25 09:12 p.m.

Injunctions can't be entered against Discords

ian 2025-07-25 09:12 p.m.

Because Discords are not people

ian 2025-07-25 09:12 p.m.

Criminal organizations are, though

honkhonk 2025-07-25 09:12 p.m.

Can you name every member

honkhonk 2025-07-25 09:12 p.m.

Is there a group listing every member

ian 2025-07-25 09:12 p.m.

Is this some sort of preliminary prothonotary screening that you're doing?

honkhonk 2025-07-25 09:13 p.m.

Yea

honkhonk

Can you name every member

ian 2025-07-25 09:13 p.m.

You misunderstand—the circumstances don't warrant that

ian 2025-07-25 09:13 p.m.

We simply seek the organizational leaders of TBH to stop incentivizing the murder for hire of my client

ian 2025-07-25 09:14 p.m.

And so we sue DownSurge and TBH

ian 2025-07-25 09:14 p.m.

I ask you to place this matter in Nomadity's docket

honkhonk 2025-07-25 09:16 p.m.

You named the Governor of Mayflower, Orangebear22 is that correct

honkhonk

You named the Governor of Mayflower, Orangebear22 is that correct

ian 2025-07-25 09:20 p.m.

Yes

ian 2025-07-25 09:20 p.m.

That is correct

ian 2025-07-25 09:20 p.m.

Can we get this assigned to an on duty judge please

ian 2025-07-25 09:21 p.m.

On call

Nicklaus 2025-07-25 09:21 p.m.

sis this aint our full time job

Nicklaus 2025-07-25 09:21 p.m.

we dont have on-call judges

Nicklaus 2025-07-25 09:21 p.m.

You've been to 3 judges

Nicklaus

we dont have on-call judges

ian 2025-07-25 09:22 p.m.

On call means somebody that's online right now

ian 2025-07-25 09:22 p.m.

And can actually take this

honkhonk 2025-07-25 09:28 p.m.

So you are looking for a judge to rule on an Emergency Protection Order against DownSurge, his Organization "The Bounty Hub", and Governor Orangebear22, who you believe are responsible for maintaining and executing a bounty on the life of your client?

honkhonk

So you are looking for a judge to rule on an Emergency Protection Order against DownSurge, his Organization "The Bounty Hub", and Governor Orangebear22, who you believe are respons...

ian 2025-07-25 09:32 p.m.

YES CAN YOU PLEASE ASSIGN IT NOW

ian 2025-07-25 09:32 p.m.

IM GONNA CRASH OUT

mike_bn 2025-07-25 09:33 p.m.

What

mike_bn 2025-07-25 09:33 p.m.

Ok stfu

mike_bn 2025-07-25 09:33 p.m.

What’s this

honkhonk

So you are looking for a judge to rule on an Emergency Protection Order against DownSurge, his Organization "The Bounty Hub", and Governor Orangebear22, who you believe are respons...

honkhonk 2025-07-25 09:33 p.m.

this about sums it up your honor @mike_bn

mike_bn

What’s this

ian 2025-07-25 09:34 p.m.

ian 2025-07-25 09:35 p.m.

Can u do a hearing now .

ian 2025-07-25 09:35 p.m.

EPO

mike_bn 2025-07-25 09:35 p.m.

How is the governor related

mike_bn 2025-07-25 09:35 p.m.

No I am at w#rk

ian 2025-07-25 09:35 p.m.

He solicited the bounty, but he is not named in his official capacity

mike_bn 2025-07-25 09:35 p.m.

J#b

mike_bn

No I am at w#rk

ian 2025-07-25 09:35 p.m.

When do you get out?

mike_bn 2025-07-25 09:35 p.m.

Whenever I want

mike_bn

J#b

ian 2025-07-25 09:36 p.m.

Pls use spoilers (||) next time

mike_bn 2025-07-25 09:36 p.m.

I don’t work for anybody

ian 2025-07-25 09:36 p.m.

Scared me

mike_bn 2025-07-25 09:36 p.m.

Sorry

ian 2025-07-25 09:36 p.m.

Its ok

mike_bn 2025-07-25 09:36 p.m.

I’m the wrong judge if you need this done quickly

ian 2025-07-25 09:36 p.m.

Alr

mike_bn 2025-07-25 09:36 p.m.

You should know this

mike_bn 2025-07-25 09:36 p.m.

I’m busy

mike_bn

You should know this

ian 2025-07-25 09:36 p.m.

I really do know it but these prothonotaries are birds of a feather

ian 2025-07-25 09:36 p.m.

Giving me a hard time

mike_bn 2025-07-25 09:36 p.m.

Re assign pls

mike_bn 2025-07-25 09:36 p.m.

Give it to a unemployed judge

ian 2025-07-25 09:36 p.m.

HOORAY

ian 2025-07-25 09:37 p.m.

MAZEL TOV

ian 2025-07-25 09:37 p.m.

@honkhonk

MAZEL TOV

ian 2025-07-25 09:37 p.m.

RE ASSIGN!

honkhonk 2025-07-25 09:37 p.m.

I'll try to assign it to the next available judge

mike_bn 2025-07-25 09:37 p.m.

Sorry Ashley

ian 2025-07-25 09:37 p.m.

@Doogy

@krabz

mike_bn 2025-07-25 09:37 p.m.

Don’t mean to give you more work

honkhonk 2025-07-25 09:37 p.m.

But in the mean time, I should finish my preliminary task

ian 2025-07-25 09:37 p.m.

honkhonk 2025-07-25 09:37 p.m.

Do you have a sworn peace officer who can vouch for this order? [Not a disqualifier]

ian 2025-07-25 09:38 p.m.

For EPO's you do need sworn statements tho

ian 2025-07-25 09:38 p.m.

It is a disqualifier if you dont

ian 2025-07-25 09:38 p.m.

But it can come from anyone

ian 2025-07-25 09:38 p.m.

For us it will come from the Petitioner(or me) in the form of testimony during a hearing

ian 2025-07-25 09:41 p.m.

@honkhonk

can you assign it to an online judge

honkhonk 2025-07-25 09:41 p.m.

Online =/= Available

honkhonk 2025-07-25 09:42 p.m.

I am looking for someone free

honkhonk

Online =/= Available

ian 2025-07-25 09:42 p.m.

So wise

ian 2025-07-25 09:42 p.m.

They should make you Prothonotary

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-25 09:47 p.m.

Channel Permissions Synced

Permissions have been synced to Chambers of Chief Judge Kezzera.

honkhonk 2025-07-25 09:48 p.m.

# Reassigned to Chief Judge Kezzera

ian 2025-07-25 09:48 p.m.

Hiii @Kezzera

ian 2025-07-25 09:48 p.m.

Petition for EPO on account of immediate impending harm on my client's life

ian 2025-07-25 09:49 p.m.

We will present evidence and required sworn statement at hearing

ian 2025-07-25 09:49 p.m.

When can we do it?

honkhonk 2025-07-25 09:49 p.m.

The Chief Judge is ingame

ian 2025-07-25 09:49 p.m.

Oh GREAT

ian 2025-07-25 09:49 p.m.

IM JOINING

ian 2025-07-25 09:50 p.m.

Kezzera 2025-07-25 09:51 p.m.

i'll consider it if your client appears in my server

honkhonk 2025-07-25 09:53 p.m.

ID: 713d-41c9

ian 2025-07-25 09:59 p.m.

@Kezzera

ian 2025-07-25 09:59 p.m.

my client is coming

ian 2025-07-25 09:59 p.m.

can we get the courtroom set up

ian 2025-07-25 10:02 p.m.

@honkhonk

I humbly ask I be refreshed once

ian 2025-07-25 10:04 p.m.

bro I SAID REFRESH

ian 2025-07-25 10:04 p.m.

IM IN MERSEA Now

Kezzera 2025-07-25 10:04 p.m.

be patient thanks

honkhonk 2025-07-25 10:04 p.m.

Yea I'm on my 2nd wifi because my 1st one is fucked

ian 2025-07-25 10:06 p.m.

@honkhonk

can u rspawn my car

ian 2025-07-25 10:07 p.m.

im gonna get cited for illegal parking

ian 2025-07-25 10:07 p.m.

great

ian 2025-07-25 10:34 p.m.

@Kezzera

ian 2025-07-25 10:34 p.m.

https://gyazo.com/3a7c4e5f7e7024ddedc9169f37436d56

Gyazo Screen Video

ian 2025-07-25 10:35 p.m.

ian 2025-07-25 10:37 p.m.

honkhonk 2025-07-25 10:38 p.m.

My rent cost 55k...

ian 2025-07-25 10:38 p.m.

honkhonk

My rent cost 55k...

ian 2025-07-25 10:38 p.m.

On god

Kezzera 2025-07-26 12:29 a.m.

@ian

See website for Order

Kezzera used

/summon

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-26 12:30 a.m.

:white_check_mark: Successfully summoned @Surge

(edited)

Kezzera used

/summon

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-26 12:31 a.m.

:x: Unable to DM @HectorMonkeyMoves

Maybe their DMs are off, the bot is blocked, or they aren't in the main clark or court servers.(edited)

Kezzera used

/summon

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-26 12:31 a.m.

:x: Unable to DM @orange

Maybe their DMs are off, the bot is blocked, or they aren't in the main clark or court servers.(edited)

BotclerkFlow

:x: Unable to DM @HectorMonkeyMoves Maybe their DMs are off, the bot is blocked, or they aren't in the main clark or court servers.

Kezzera 2025-07-26 12:32 a.m.

Put on the record that an attempt at electronic service was made. 7/26/25 5:32AM BST

BotclerkFlow

:x: Unable to DM @orange Maybe their DMs are off, the bot is blocked, or they aren't in the main clark or court servers.

Kezzera 2025-07-26 12:32 a.m.

Put on the record that an attempt at electronic service was made. 7/26/25 5:32AM BST

Kezzera used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-26 12:33 a.m.

Case Modified

@Kezzera

has added @HectorMonkeyMoves to the case channel.

Kezzera used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-26 12:33 a.m.

Case Modified

@Kezzera

has added @Surge to the case channel.

Kezzera used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-26 12:33 a.m.

Case Modified

@Kezzera

has added @orange to the case channel.

ian 2025-07-26 12:36 a.m.

Massive victory in the courts today

ian 2025-07-26 12:36 a.m.

Columbians will remember this day, the 25th of July, 2025

orange 2025-07-26 12:44 a.m.

I’m here your honor @Kezzera

orange 2025-07-26 12:44 a.m.

Dms are off cause

orange 2025-07-26 12:44 a.m.

Heh. You know.

Kezzera 2025-07-26 12:45 a.m.

okay yeah but you need to be served too

orange 2025-07-26 12:45 a.m.

Am I being sued in my individual or official capacity im a bit confused

orange 2025-07-26 12:45 a.m.

What kind of lawyer do I dm

Kezzera 2025-07-26 12:45 a.m.

he's going for both

orange 2025-07-26 12:45 a.m.

uhh

orange 2025-07-26 12:45 a.m.

so do I dm my personal lawyer or doj

Kezzera 2025-07-26 12:45 a.m.

i've written in the order regarding your personal appearance, so show that to the lawyer

Kezzera 2025-07-26 12:46 a.m.

you can have both

orange 2025-07-26 12:46 a.m.

Kezzera 2025-07-26 12:46 a.m.

they may try to work out the logistics

Kezzera 2025-07-26 12:46 a.m.

@ian

I assume your client will have the police handle the particular service because of the dangerous nature of the alleged actions(edited)

Kezzera 2025-07-26 12:47 a.m.

or otherwise I will amend it to be served a different way

orange 2025-07-26 12:47 a.m.

Do I open my f s

orange 2025-07-26 12:47 a.m.

Dms

orange 2025-07-26 12:47 a.m.

So you can serve me

Kezzera 2025-07-26 12:47 a.m.

You should yes

orange 2025-07-26 12:47 a.m.

I’ll open it for the courts server

Kezzera 2025-07-26 12:48 a.m.

Thanks Gov

Kezzera 2025-07-26 12:49 a.m.

attempting second service

Kezzera used

/summon

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-26 12:50 a.m.

:white_check_mark: Successfully summoned @orange

(edited)

BotclerkFlow

:white_check_mark: Successfully summoned @orange

Kezzera 2025-07-26 12:50 a.m.

Electronic service complete

orange 2025-07-26 12:51 a.m.

received

orange 2025-07-26 12:51 a.m.

do you need me to do anything now your honor

orange 2025-07-26 12:52 a.m.

how’d you get that font

orange 2025-07-26 12:52 a.m.

orange 2025-07-26 12:53 a.m.

@Kezzera

both of these questions are of utmost importance

orange

how’d you get that font

ian 2025-07-26 09:51 a.m.

I tried to figure it out too

ian 2025-07-26 09:52 a.m.

I think he just has a trackpad to edit the PDFs

ian 2025-07-26 10:03 a.m.

@Kezzera

we move for an expedited order to compel appearance and expedited order to verify compliance

ian 2025-07-26 10:03 a.m.

The EPO is still very much an emergency until the bounty is taken down and there is proof of such

ian 2025-07-26 10:04 a.m.

And all the parties to this proceeding are well aware of it—HectorMonkeyMoves was personally spectating the hearing

Surge 2025-07-26 12:59 p.m.

it was actually kaylapls whos behind the bounty board

Surge 2025-07-26 12:59 p.m.

we should summon her to this @Kezzera

Surge

it was actually kaylapls whos behind the bounty board

ian 2025-07-26 01:02 p.m.

You need to show proof that it isn't you

Surge 2025-07-26 01:02 p.m.

ok 1 sec

orange 2025-07-26 01:03 p.m.

@Surge

Downsurge

orange 2025-07-26 01:03 p.m.

We need to beat the case

orange 2025-07-26 01:03 p.m.

Like Epstein

Surge 2025-07-26 01:03 p.m.

https://gyazo.com/7ba1fe1c3905a16a0e7662d2aa342d35

Gyazo

Surge 2025-07-26 01:03 p.m.

@ian

Surge

https://gyazo.com/7ba1fe1c3905a16a0e7662d2aa342d35

orange 2025-07-26 01:03 p.m.

THIS IS PRETTY CREDIBLE

Surge 2025-07-26 01:03 p.m.

yes i think so to

Surge 2025-07-26 01:03 p.m.

@Kezzera

do you concur your honor?

ian

@Kezzera we move for an expedited order to compel appearance and expedited order to verify compliance

ian 2025-07-26 02:46 p.m.

@Kezzera

orange

@Kezzera both of these questions are of utmost importance

Kezzera 2025-07-26 03:00 p.m.

49 years of maths

Surge

we should summon her to this @Kezzera

Kezzera 2025-07-26 03:00 p.m.

that's a strong claim you make

Surge

@Kezzera do you concur your honor?

Kezzera 2025-07-26 03:01 p.m.

no, im sorry

ian

@Kezzera we move for an expedited order to compel appearance and expedited order to verify compliance

Kezzera 2025-07-26 03:02 p.m.

seems the people are here

Kezzera 2025-07-26 03:02 p.m.

and since they are i'll just ask

Kezzera 2025-07-26 03:02 p.m.

@Surge

are you able to confirm that you have complied with the order

Kezzera 2025-07-26 03:02 p.m.

specifically the bit about the bounty being taken down

Surge 2025-07-26 04:21 p.m.

@Kezzera

yeah hes not on there anymore

Surge 2025-07-26 04:21 p.m.

https://gyazo.com/a0af92503ad3ab674480203bb594f455

Gyazo

Surge

https://gyazo.com/a0af92503ad3ab674480203bb594f455

ian 2025-07-26 06:13 p.m.

you should probably also stop incentivizing the murder of other people

ian 2025-07-26 06:14 p.m.

except for kaylapls, you're doing god's work there

ian 2025-07-26 06:14 p.m.

@dero

@tom

@ıllıllı ᵂⁱˡˡⁱᵃᵐ ıllıllı

@El Taco Man

you could all sue tho

Surge

https://gyazo.com/a0af92503ad3ab674480203bb594f455

Kezzera 2025-07-26 07:13 p.m.

thanks

ian

except for kaylapls, you're doing god's work there

Kezzera 2025-07-26 07:13 p.m.

counsel?

ian

@dero

@tom

@ıllıllı ᵂⁱˡˡⁱᵃᵐ ıllıllı

@El Taco Man you could all sue tho

Kezzera 2025-07-26 07:13 p.m.

what the hell are you using this for?

ian 2025-07-26 07:13 p.m.

Sorry Y'r H'n'r I didn't mean that

ian 2025-07-26 07:13 p.m.

Even KaylaPls deserves life

Kezzera 2025-07-26 07:13 p.m.

gang my courtroom is not a public stage

Kezzera 2025-07-26 07:13 p.m.

not here

ian 2025-07-26 07:14 p.m.

You're right I apologize

Kezzera 2025-07-26 07:15 p.m.

thank you

ian

you should probably also stop incentivizing the murder of other people

Surge 2025-07-26 07:59 p.m.

whats ur ign

Surge 2025-07-26 07:59 p.m.

i think you need a bounty

Surge 2025-07-26 08:56 p.m.

alright i got an offer @tagheurs 3 slamburgers and 20 clark dollars

Surge 2025-07-26 08:56 p.m.

thats my settlement offer

Surge

i think you need a bounty

Kezzera 2025-07-26 11:21 p.m.

mr. surge

Kezzera 2025-07-26 11:21 p.m.

i advise you to not make such comments(edited)

Surge 2025-07-26 11:21 p.m.

my apologies your honor

Kezzera 2025-07-26 11:21 p.m.

it's fine

Surge 2025-07-26 11:22 p.m.

we are offering 200k and 10 slamburgers

Surge 2025-07-26 11:22 p.m.

i believe that is a fair recompense for the damages caused

Kezzera 2025-07-26 11:22 p.m.

you should discuss it with the petitioner's attorney

Surge 2025-07-26 11:32 p.m.

@HectorMonkeyMoves

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-26 11:32 p.m.

Surge

we are offering 200k and 10 slamburgers

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-26 11:32 p.m.

i think this is fair as well

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-26 11:41 p.m.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1275901615492305017/1292778727125680149/IMG_6426.gif

Surge Server2025-07-26 11:41 p.m.

Kezzera used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-27 12:31 a.m.

Case Modified

@Kezzera

has added @ian to the case channel.

ian 2025-07-27 10:54 a.m.

@Kezzera

hello Y'r H'n'r

ian 2025-07-27 10:54 a.m.

Can we clarify that the order extends to not paying people who have already killed my client

ian 2025-07-27 10:54 a.m.

He's been killed at least 4 times and Im sure, while the bounty is down, TBH is still paying people for having killed Petitioner

ian 2025-07-27 10:55 a.m.

and if that's the case it would be a violation of the order to which I would like you to impose sanctions

ian 2025-07-27 12:04 p.m.

@Kezzera

orange 2025-07-27 12:47 p.m.

if people did allegedly kill the client on request on tbh for payment (which nobody here can prove ) I think that payment should still be afforded because a service was provided and payment was promised

orange 2025-07-27 12:47 p.m.

that would be very poor service and scamming if you don’t pay people who do work for you

orange 2025-07-27 12:47 p.m.

of course we don’t know if these guys even DID what this frivolous counselor is alleging , frivolously,

orange 2025-07-27 12:48 p.m.

tbh doesn’t even exist

orange 2025-07-27 12:48 p.m.

it’s a clothing store

orange 2025-07-27 12:48 p.m.

bounty clothing

orange 2025-07-27 12:55 p.m.

Your honor please let it reflect the record that the executive branch did conduct an investigation on this and found that I did nothing wrong @Kezzera

orange 2025-07-27 12:55 p.m.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1059731192515141673/1299894410271784972/togif.gif

orange

if people did allegedly kill the client on request on tbh for payment (which nobody here can prove ) I think that payment should still be afforded because a service was provided a...

ian 2025-07-27 02:03 p.m.

@Kezzera

with all due respect your honor this argument is simply restarded

ian 2025-07-27 02:04 p.m.

The payment of bounty hunters (who we can prove killed my client for the bounty, though it isn't even necessary or relevant here) further incentivizes the murder of my client

ian 2025-07-27 02:04 p.m.

And causes distrust in the judiciary

ian 2025-07-27 02:05 p.m.

Because people think so long as they complete the job before the judiciary enjoins it they will get the money anyway, even after the injunction, which obviously causes distrust in the judiciary and further incentivizes murder

ian 2025-07-27 02:05 p.m.

This court has no responsibility to uphold agreements that include illegality

ian 2025-07-27 02:06 p.m.

Additionally, this is an insane stance to have as a high ranking individual of the government, held to higher standards, and should be grounds for impeachment

orange 2025-07-27 02:07 p.m.

Again I investigated myself and found I did nothing wrong

orange 2025-07-27 02:08 p.m.

Don’t know why we’re still here

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-27 02:29 p.m.

The notice was already put out, instead of making hypotheticals come with actual proof rather than if this occurred this would need to be changed

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-27 02:29 p.m.

just spewing bullshit and hoping it works

HectorMonkeyMoves

The notice was already put out, instead of making hypotheticals come with actual proof rather than if this occurred this would need to be changed

ian 2025-07-27 02:37 p.m.

That's not how it works

ian 2025-07-27 02:37 p.m.

If you're going to call me bullshit then please at least consult with an attorney first before doing it

ian 2025-07-27 02:38 p.m.

You are the one that is expected to prove that you are complying with a court order, especially one as important as an EPO, and that you are taking affirmative steps toward it

ian 2025-07-27 02:38 p.m.

NOT us

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-27 02:55 p.m.

no thanks

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-27 02:56 p.m.

and we also have an individual from the courts who can confirm that we are following the EPO whereas all you can do is pose hypotheticals

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-27 02:58 p.m.

so all steps have been taken

ian

That's not how it works

Surge 2025-07-27 03:44 p.m.

i mean burden of proof is on the accuser

Surge 2025-07-27 03:44 p.m.

weve already provided documentation proving he was off the bounty

Surge 2025-07-27 03:44 p.m.

if you have evidence that we are still paying people for him (which you dont because we dont do that) then please display it here for everyone to see

Surge

i mean burden of proof is on the accuser

ian 2025-07-27 04:02 p.m.

...no

ian 2025-07-27 04:02 p.m.

burden of proof is on us when we bring an accusation

ian 2025-07-27 04:02 p.m.

however it's on you to prove that you're complying with an injunction

ian 2025-07-27 04:02 p.m.

not on us

orange 2025-07-27 05:02 p.m.

No you have the burden of proof

orange 2025-07-27 05:02 p.m.

You suck at lawyering

ian 2025-07-27 05:14 p.m.

Ragebait or mental retardation?

ian 2025-07-27 05:14 p.m.

Fortunately it's the former

ian

Can we clarify that the order extends to not paying people who have already killed my client

ian 2025-07-27 05:15 p.m.

@Kezzera

ian

Ragebait or mental retardation?

orange 2025-07-27 05:38 p.m.

This is very unbecoming of an attorney even while we await trial your honor.

I will not be called slurs right before a judge or rather any setting. I request you hold him in contempt your highness. @Kezzera

orange 2025-07-27 05:39 p.m.

edit

~~“of an attorney”~~ of an opposing party’s counsel

orange 2025-07-27 05:41 p.m.

“The R-word, ‘retard’ or ‘retarded,’ is a slur used against people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. It is hate speech, no different from slurs used to insult someone’s race, ethnicity, religion or sexual orientation” (Special Olympics).

Special Olympics. “Why the R-Word Is the R-Slur.” Special Olympics, 1 Mar. 2021, www.specialolympics.org/stories/impact/why-the-r-word-is-the-r-slur. Accessed 27 July 2025.

ian

and if that's the case it would be a violation of the order to which I would like you to impose sanctions

Kezzera 2025-07-27 05:47 p.m.

So you need to present this

orange

if people did allegedly kill the client on request on tbh for payment (which nobody here can prove ) I think that payment should still be afforded because a service was provided a...

Kezzera 2025-07-27 05:48 p.m.

orange

Your honor please let it reflect the record that the executive branch did conduct an investigation on this and found that I did nothing wrong @Kezzera

Kezzera 2025-07-27 05:48 p.m.

thank you HM High Constable

orange 2025-07-27 05:50 p.m.

How do I hold him in contempt @Kezzera

orange 2025-07-27 05:50 p.m.

Do I need To make document

Kezzera 2025-07-27 05:51 p.m.

You need to get a lawyer to help you with this

Kezzera 2025-07-27 05:51 p.m.

Do you have one(edited)

Kezzera 2025-07-27 05:54 p.m.

@ian

You should know how to seek clarification

Surge 2025-07-27 06:09 p.m.

AND ANYONE WHO CAME HERE TODAY TO HERE ME WHINE TO HEAR ME BEG YOU CAN KISS MY ASS!!!!

ian 2025-07-27 06:11 p.m.

@Kezzera

I paperlessly move for sanctions against each and every one of the respondents on account of their repeated disrespect, insubordination to the court

ian 2025-07-27 06:11 p.m.

Along with the fact orange is trying to ragebait me

Kezzera

@ian You should know how to seek clarification

ian 2025-07-27 06:12 p.m.

I was moving paperlessly, surely you can reciprocate likewise by clarifying

ian 2025-07-27 06:12 p.m.

If you'd like, I can put it on paper, and you can respond in the same way

Surge 2025-07-27 06:12 p.m.

buddy we havent done any insubordination

Surge 2025-07-27 06:13 p.m.

there is no bounty on you like jokes aside seriously u are just schizo

ian 2025-07-27 06:13 p.m.

That's not what I'm referring to. You should save your rant.

Surge 2025-07-27 06:13 p.m.

accusing us of circumventing court orders then attemtping lawfare when you arent satisfied with the way things are going isnt very professional

ian 2025-07-27 06:13 p.m.

Lawfare is a funny word

ian 2025-07-27 06:13 p.m.

Like legal warfare

ian 2025-07-27 06:14 p.m.

Absolutely not what's happening here, but sure

Surge 2025-07-27 06:14 p.m.

if hes still getting killed thats a personal issue

Surge 2025-07-27 06:14 p.m.

we issued two seperate pings and removed him off the list

Surge 2025-07-27 06:14 p.m.

we arent responsible for his personal beefs

Surge

if hes still getting killed thats a personal issue

ian 2025-07-27 06:14 p.m.

That is not, again, what I said. And your rants in this scenario mean nothing

Surge 2025-07-27 06:14 p.m.

ian 2025-07-27 06:15 p.m.

Let the judge deliberate on my motion for clarification and sanctions. And seek counsel

Surge 2025-07-27 06:15 p.m.

nah per se is working out great for me

ian 2025-07-27 06:15 p.m.

I won't respond to further ragebaiting

ian 2025-07-27 06:15 p.m.

ian 2025-07-27 06:16 p.m.

@Kezzera

so we have a pending motion for clarification and a pending motion for sanctions—both paperless. If you would require me to append any to paper, let me know, and I'll hastily accommodate

Surge 2025-07-27 06:16 p.m.

ide like to submit this picture into offical court documents

Surge 2025-07-27 06:16 p.m.

Surge 2025-07-27 06:17 p.m.

the passkey to the TBH admin panel is hidden in cryllic braille painted in UV paint

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-27 06:43 p.m.

@Kezzera

your honor, I think it's somewhat unprofessional of the opposing lawyer to be calling the governor and TBH retarded inside of the channel....

ian 2025-07-27 06:45 p.m.

Stop clogging the channel pls

ian

@Kezzera so we have a pending motion for clarification and a pending motion for sanctions—both paperless. If you would require me to append any to paper, let me know, ...

ian 2025-07-27 06:46 p.m.

@Kezzera

ian

If you'd like, I can put it on paper, and you can respond in the same way

Kezzera 2025-07-27 06:57 p.m.

You must

Surge

AND ANYONE WHO CAME HERE TODAY TO HERE ME WHINE TO HEAR ME BEG YOU CAN KISS MY ASS!!!!

Kezzera 2025-07-27 06:58 p.m.

Mr Surge please refrain from using such language, it would be appreciated

ian

@Kezzera

Kezzera 2025-07-27 07:01 p.m.

On paper. This would be the proper way

Surge

the passkey to the TBH admin panel is hidden in cryllic braille painted in UV paint

Kezzera 2025-07-27 07:02 p.m.

This can be considered but I don't know how relevant it will be for our purposes

ian

Ragebait or mental retardation?

Kezzera 2025-07-27 07:02 p.m.

Likewise, you should withdraw this comment counsel

Surge 2025-07-27 07:19 p.m.

i petition for the court to allow such circusry to continue

Kezzera

Likewise, you should withdraw this comment counsel

ian 2025-07-27 07:58 p.m.

I'll withdraw the latter statement

ian 2025-07-27 07:59 p.m.

I stand steadfast by the claim that these guys are ragebaiting

ian 2025-07-27 07:59 p.m.

Surge

i petition for the court to allow such circusry to continue

Kezzera 2025-07-27 08:08 p.m.

no!

ian

I stand steadfast by the claim that these guys are ragebaiting

Kezzera 2025-07-27 08:08 p.m.

okay and i deal with it

Kezzera

okay and i deal with it

ian 2025-07-27 09:00 p.m.

yes

ian 2025-07-27 09:00 p.m.

I'll make a written motion Y'r H'n'r

ian 2025-07-27 09:05 p.m.

paper*

orange 2025-07-27 09:22 p.m.

Your highest and most divine excellency @Kezzera

orange 2025-07-27 09:22 p.m.

I still wish to hold npz in contempt

orange 2025-07-27 09:22 p.m.

For his comments

orange 2025-07-27 09:22 p.m.

He yelled a slur at me your righteousness

Kezzera 2025-07-27 10:04 p.m.

okay i'm not going to bother with this

Kezzera 2025-07-27 10:04 p.m.

i don't just throw someone in contempt because they said a mean word to you once unless they refuse to take it back or keep doing it

Kezzera 2025-07-27 10:08 p.m.

i'm going to clarify what is going to happen:
1. if there's belief that the court order is not being followed, plaintiff must raise it on paper and have it filed for service to defendants. why on paper? documented evidence
2. contempt is not something i throw out nilly-willy and i'm tired of getting pushed around to do that. please get a grip and show some respect for my authority, im just doing my job
3. same goes for ragebaiting, get a grip

Kezzera 2025-07-27 10:08 p.m.

counsel, your comment calling the pro se defendants retarded is gross and unprofessional - while i get you are frustrated it is not okay to call them that - i hold you to a high standard in that you should show a little bit of patience and respect while defendants who want to get counsel wish to get them, even if they decide to later(edited)

Kezzera 2025-07-27 10:09 p.m.

this goes for anyone, if any of you start throwing figurative shit at each other when i warn you not to you will start going to jail

Kezzera 2025-07-27 10:09 p.m.

it's your only warning, and itsbeing in front of my face

Kezzera 2025-07-27 10:09 p.m.

this is virtually a 24/7 open court, so everything done here is on the record and consistently noted

Kezzera 2025-07-27 10:11 p.m.

if we dont start showing respect for eachother then frankly we're all wasting eachothers time

Kezzera 2025-07-27 10:13 p.m.

i'm directing that everyone here stops talking to each other in the case channel if they will not provide me:
- an update to the case
- a specific request regarding the case
- information which is relevant to the case

Kezzera 2025-07-27 10:13 p.m.

i am aware that @Surge and @HectorMonkeyMoves are going pro se, and you may choose to

Kezzera 2025-07-27 10:13 p.m.

but i am holding you both to the standard of a lawyer

Kezzera 2025-07-27 10:14 p.m.

i expect you to file paperwork as required and make legal submissions that are at least sufficient

Kezzera 2025-07-27 10:14 p.m.

the difference is that you don't have the burden of dealing with professional consequences

Kezzera 2025-07-27 10:15 p.m.

if you cannot do that, you should get a lawyer

Kezzera 2025-07-27 10:15 p.m.

ok i've made myself clear

ian 2025-07-27 10:15 p.m.

yes

Kezzera 2025-07-27 10:16 p.m.

i have shit to deal with, a lot of shit and it makes it very hard for me to deal with this any more fairly than i can if i am bogged down with this kind of crap

Kezzera 2025-07-27 10:16 p.m.

so please, show some respect, all of you

Kezzera 2025-07-27 10:17 p.m.

i hope im right in that everyone here understands what i am asking for

Kezzera 2025-07-27 10:18 p.m.

im just being real

ian 2025-07-27 10:24 p.m.

@Kezzera

Y'r H'n'r, courts have long held that respondents to injunctions, once they are enjoined, have the burden of showing that they are actively complying.

ian 2025-07-27 10:24 p.m.

The court can't take their word for it alone

ian 2025-07-27 10:25 p.m.

As such, once I obtain clarification on the order, I will ask to see if Respondents have followed it to the letter, and I will expect it

Surge 2025-07-28 02:01 a.m.

im invoking the right to a jury trial

Surge

im invoking the right to a jury trial

ian 2025-07-28 08:16 a.m.

That's like among the only two rights we don't recognize in Clark

ian 2025-07-28 08:17 a.m.

And this isn't a triable case

Surge

im invoking the right to a jury trial

Kezzera 2025-07-28 12:23 p.m.

we don't do jury trials, we've consistently rejected it here

ian

The court can't take their word for it alone

Kezzera 2025-07-28 12:26 p.m.

and i can't just take yours

Kezzera 2025-07-28 12:26 p.m.

show me when and how he violated it, i need some kind of prima facie evidence

ian

And this isn't a triable case

Kezzera 2025-07-28 12:30 p.m.

..?

Kezzera

show me when and how he violated it, i need some kind of prima facie evidence

ian 2025-07-28 12:45 p.m.

I'm not saying he violated it

ian 2025-07-28 12:45 p.m.

And I don't need to

ian 2025-07-28 12:46 p.m.

He has to show to the court that he is complying once he is enjoined

ian 2025-07-28 12:46 p.m.

I don't need to be able to prove that he is violating anything, or even claim it at all

Kezzera

..?

ian 2025-07-28 12:46 p.m.

It's not a case that can be tried because it's only a matter in re an EPO

ian 2025-07-28 12:46 p.m.

Not a lawsuit, for example

Surge 2025-07-28 04:40 p.m.

well it seems to me the only satisfiable way to prove to you im not violating the EPO is to show you all my dms which im not doing because that would violate the rule 8 of so many people

Surge 2025-07-28 04:40 p.m.

that would also require me to personally be dming everyone that theres still a boutny

Surge 2025-07-28 04:40 p.m.

which is a ridiculous conspiracy

orange 2025-07-28 06:06 p.m.

im invoking the right to a jury trial

Kezzera

counsel, your comment calling the pro se defendants retarded is gross and unprofessional - while i get you are frustrated it is not okay to call them that - i hold you to a high st...(edited)

orange 2025-07-28 06:07 p.m.

thank you for this judge just now seeing it

Kezzera

i am aware that @Surge and @HectorMonkeyMoves are going pro se, and you may choose to

orange 2025-07-28 06:08 p.m.

speaking of my lawyer Walter has had a crash out and I may need more time to find someone who isn’t Walter

orange 2025-07-28 06:08 p.m.

is the court fine with giving me an extension, my apologies as it was very unexpected

orange 2025-07-28 06:11 p.m.

it appears my ticket is now closed

orange 2025-07-28 06:11 p.m.

please ping attorneys your honor

Surge

well it seems to me the only satisfiable way to prove to you im not violating the EPO is to show you all my dms which im not doing because that would violate the rule 8 of so many ...

ian 2025-07-28 06:16 p.m.

Not remotely what I'm asking

ian 2025-07-28 06:17 p.m.

You already showed you took the bounty down, and that's sufficient

ian 2025-07-28 06:17 p.m.

What I will want you to show is that you didn't pay anybody retroactively for the bounty once it was already enjoined

orange 2025-07-28 06:17 p.m.

What if they were already paid

orange 2025-07-28 06:18 p.m.

How does he prove he didn’t pay anyone

orange 2025-07-28 06:18 p.m.

What

orange

How does he prove he didn’t pay anyone

ian 2025-07-28 06:18 p.m.

He says "I didn't pay anyone"

orange 2025-07-28 06:18 p.m.

Ok so take his word for it

orange 2025-07-28 06:18 p.m.

How’s he supposed to prove that

ian 2025-07-28 06:18 p.m.

But I better not find out he's lying

orange

Ok so take his word for it

ian 2025-07-28 06:18 p.m.

I will

ian 2025-07-28 06:18 p.m.

...once he gives me it

ian 2025-07-28 06:18 p.m.

It's not hard to understand Mr Governor

orange 2025-07-28 06:18 p.m.

????

ian 2025-07-28 06:19 p.m.

It's not hard to understand

ian 2025-07-28 06:19 p.m.

And also, it's not even required yet until I actually seek clarification

ian 2025-07-28 06:19 p.m.

So please stop clogging this channel and addressing the court when I haven't even formally made a request

ian 2025-07-28 06:19 p.m.

You should urgently seek counsel

Surge 2025-07-28 06:28 p.m.

we dont need counsel to follow a basic court order

Surge

we dont need counsel to follow a basic court order

ian 2025-07-28 06:33 p.m.

Clearly your fellow respondent does to simply understand it ...

Surge 2025-07-28 06:34 p.m.

are you implying that we are violating the EPO in some way?

Surge

are you implying that we are violating the EPO in some way?

ian 2025-07-28 06:39 p.m.

Further evidence that you do need counsel

ian 2025-07-28 06:39 p.m.

NO!

ian 2025-07-28 06:39 p.m.

I'm not and I think this is the third time I'm explaining it

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-28 09:23 p.m.

you clearly do given you constantly ask the same question over and over

ian 2025-07-28 09:24 p.m.

you see I would respond to that

ian 2025-07-28 09:24 p.m.

but since Ive already explained it like 5 times

ian 2025-07-28 09:24 p.m.

I wont

ian 2025-07-28 09:24 p.m.

you can scroll up

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-28 09:24 p.m.

no thanks

ian 2025-07-28 09:24 p.m.

or retain counsel

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-28 09:24 p.m.

nothing you say has any use

ian 2025-07-28 09:24 p.m.

or just be willfully ignorant

ian 2025-07-28 09:24 p.m.

idc

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-28 09:24 p.m.

you just spew garbage in giant walls of text....

HectorMonkeyMoves

nothing you say has any use

ian 2025-07-28 09:24 p.m.

https://tenor.com/view/himalayas-fancam-mountain-gif-25613920

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-28 09:24 p.m.

and expect the judge to agree with you

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-28 09:25 p.m.

https://tenor.com/view/buzzlight-year-gif-23473774

ian 2025-07-28 09:25 p.m.

sure I do bro

ian 2025-07-28 09:25 p.m.

whatever floats ur boat

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-28 09:41 p.m.

my boat always floats

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-28 09:41 p.m.

you just do a poor job

orange

is the court fine with giving me an extension, my apologies as it was very unexpected

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:41 p.m.

yes that's fine, thanks for letting me know

Kezzera

yes that's fine, thanks for letting me know

ian 2025-07-28 09:42 p.m.

An extension to what your honor

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:42 p.m.

also NONE OF YOU FUCKING LISTEN!!!

ian 2025-07-28 09:42 p.m.

Oh the OSC

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:42 p.m.

no him finding counsel

ian 2025-07-28 09:42 p.m.

no right

ian 2025-07-28 09:42 p.m.

For the OSC

ian 2025-07-28 09:42 p.m.

What else would he need counsel for

Kezzera

i'm directing that everyone here stops talking to each other in the case channel if they will not provide me: - an update to the case - a specific request regarding the case - info...

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:42 p.m.

@HectorMonkeyMoves

@Surge

@ian

ian 2025-07-28 09:42 p.m.

I havent moved the court yet, so thats the only thing pending

Kezzera

@HectorMonkeyMoves

@Surge

@ian

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:43 p.m.

@orange

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-28 09:43 p.m.

https://tenor.com/view/end-of-watch-locker-scene-jake-gyllenhaal-gif-8856476536569176567

ian

What else would he need counsel for

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:43 p.m.

aye

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:44 p.m.

also none of you listen

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:45 p.m.

go back and forth about the case itself elsewhere, not here. i get no insight from back and forths

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:45 p.m.

ive already explained prima facie evidence

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:46 p.m.

and we'll deal with it when we get there

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:47 p.m.

if it's a simple inquiry about whether the court order is being complied with, it should be regarding the respondent following a clearly written-out term of the order or the whole order

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:48 p.m.

so np is fine

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:48 p.m.

if np received information there was retroactive payment and such payment was not permitted under the order, after clarification, then fine we deal with that

ian 2025-07-28 09:48 p.m.

Your honor right now the only thing pending is the OSC

ian 2025-07-28 09:49 p.m.

In however many days

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:49 p.m.

trial in the sense that indeed there will be the consideration of facts and evidence needed to support the permanent epo and we'll need both sides

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:49 p.m.

and its weighed by me

ian 2025-07-28 09:49 p.m.

I intend to move for clarification on the order to establish that the order extends to not paying people retroactively for the murder of tagheurs—once I receive clarification, I will ask that they confirm they did not violate the order

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:50 p.m.

orange wants a lawyer, if he needs time he'll get that time

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:50 p.m.

ok, file the motion when you can then

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:50 p.m.

let me know when you do

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:50 p.m.

until then nothing is happening other than prep on both sides

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:51 p.m.

no fucking back and forths

Kezzera

orange wants a lawyer, if he needs time he'll get that time

ian 2025-07-28 09:51 p.m.

Your honor respectfully why is it so imperative that orangebear (as the governor of the state, who should have an entire workforce of lawyers behind him) obtain counsel for a simple EPO OSC that, at most, will result in the order to not harm my client being made permanent

ian 2025-07-28 09:51 p.m.

I mean I can see it's important he get counsel

ian 2025-07-28 09:51 p.m.

But I don't think the extension is necessary for such

ian 2025-07-28 09:51 p.m.

Especially given the circumstances, how little is at stake for him

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:52 p.m.

whether he is the governor or not is of complete irrelevance to me, he is of equal standing here

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:52 p.m.

and any person before me

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:52 p.m.

when it comes to representation

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:53 p.m.

if he wants a lawyer, he says he can get one and he seeks short continuance to do that, then he can

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:53 p.m.

i have no reason to deny it unless its so manifestly excessive and it would not infringe his rights

ian 2025-07-28 09:53 p.m.

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:54 p.m.

right

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:54 p.m.

i make it very fucking clear

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:54 p.m.

right now

ian 2025-07-28 09:54 p.m.

No crosstalk, yes

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:54 p.m.

back and forths

are entirely prohibited

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:54 p.m.

yes

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:54 p.m.

start it, any one of you

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:54 p.m.

it's 3 days contempt, and 7 days straight after

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:55 p.m.

for every crosstalk message i see

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:55 p.m.

start fucking listening

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:55 p.m.

you send a message if you have:
- an update to the case
- a specific request regarding the case
- information which is relevant to the case

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:55 p.m.

crosstalk does not embody any part of this

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:56 p.m.

if parties have an issue with the case which does not require my attention, go elsewhere about it

ian 2025-07-28 09:56 p.m.

@Kezzera

can you direct the respondents to friend me so I can satisfy meet and confer requirements regarding the two incoming motions

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:57 p.m.

@Surge

@HectorMonkeyMoves

@orange

please accept a friend request from this discord account: upyf

ian 2025-07-28 09:57 p.m.

Sent

ian 2025-07-28 09:58 p.m.

I believe orangebear has blocked me so he would have to redress that first I believe

ian 2025-07-28 09:58 p.m.

If they choose not to it's fine I'll just move without their input

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:58 p.m.

@orange

either you have to eventually unblock them, have your lawyer do it once you get it or they may have to proceed without input

ian 2025-07-28 09:59 p.m.

Actually your honor

ian 2025-07-28 09:59 p.m.

This is kind of time sensitive

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:59 p.m.

it actually better be time sensitive

Kezzera 2025-07-28 09:59 p.m.

what is it

ian 2025-07-28 09:59 p.m.

@Kezzera

could you make a thread under this for an in chambers examination

Kezzera

@Surge

@HectorMonkeyMoves

@orange please accept a friend request from this discord account: upyf

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-28 09:59 p.m.

why

ian 2025-07-28 09:59 p.m.

I promise the topic to be sensitive

ian 2025-07-28 09:59 p.m.

I dont want the respondents seeing it

ian 2025-07-28 10:00 p.m.

Otherwise you can make it public after the fact

HectorMonkeyMoves

why

Kezzera 2025-07-28 10:00 p.m.

we have a court rule that requires parties meet together and try to resolve issues before one side files the paperwork raising those issues formally

ian 2025-07-28 10:00 p.m.

It concerns why I'm moving for this, and why I probably won't be able to wait for respondents' meet and confer input

Kezzera 2025-07-28 10:00 p.m.

yes, very

Kezzera 2025-07-28 10:01 p.m.

moving for in camera examination without the input of respondents is generally not granted

Kezzera

we have a court rule that requires parties meet together and try to resolve issues before one side files the paperwork raising those issues formally

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-28 10:01 p.m.

Kezzera 2025-07-28 10:01 p.m.

unless theres really good reasons why

HectorMonkeyMoves

Kezzera 2025-07-28 10:02 p.m.

it was added as a way for parties to resolve their differences in a particular issue in the case without the court's input and promote civility

Kezzera 2025-07-28 10:02 p.m.

and honest, good faith attempt at or resolution

Kezzera 2025-07-28 10:02 p.m.

it's not just busy work

Kezzera

unless theres really good reasons why

ian 2025-07-28 10:02 p.m.

Yes it concerns a fact I wish to keep concealed from respondents for the time being

ian 2025-07-28 10:03 p.m.

It's risky

ian 2025-07-28 10:03 p.m.

I can go into detail in an in-chambers thread @Kezzera

Kezzera 2025-07-28 10:03 p.m.

ok, file the motion in writing

Kezzera 2025-07-28 10:04 p.m.

you should know how to move this

ian 2025-07-28 10:04 p.m.

Yes I just typically prefer to do things paperlessly

ian 2025-07-28 10:04 p.m.

I come to learn you don't share this philosophy

Kezzera 2025-07-28 10:04 p.m.

no, i'm moving away from that practice(edited)

Kezzera 2025-07-28 10:04 p.m.

it causes too many issues in the record and frankly does not help me follow the case

ian 2025-07-28 10:05 p.m.

Ok so I have to move for an in-chambers review of evidence in support of a motion for clarification

ian 2025-07-28 10:05 p.m.

Good jesus

Kezzera 2025-07-28 10:06 p.m.

excuse me?

Kezzera 2025-07-28 10:06 p.m.

good jesus?

ian 2025-07-28 10:06 p.m.

I'm just expressing discontent to the world because I have to do a lot of complicated work

ian 2025-07-28 10:06 p.m.

Not at the court

Kezzera 2025-07-28 10:07 p.m.

why do i feel that's not in fact the case

ian 2025-07-28 10:07 p.m.

I don't know

ian 2025-07-28 10:07 p.m.

It is

ian 2025-07-28 10:07 p.m.

I have the upmost respect for this court and its members

Kezzera 2025-07-28 10:08 p.m.

please reserve your frustrations, it can come off the wrong way to the court unless it is clearly not directed at the court

Kezzera

it causes too many issues in the record and frankly does not help me follow the case

Kezzera 2025-07-28 10:09 p.m.

and arguably it may present legal issues (with how the record can get lost, corrupted, etc. and/or the motion may fail to follow the required legal form and affect the rights of the other party) - adding this

ian 2025-07-28 10:09 p.m.

Ok noted, I'll make sure to direct my anger at my wife @steva once I'm back home and have had one too many

Kezzera 2025-07-28 10:09 p.m.

that's not funny.

ian 2025-07-28 10:09 p.m.

I will write the motions now your honor, thank you, god bless

ian 2025-07-28 10:10 p.m.

Ok mb.

ian

Ok noted, I'll make sure to direct my anger at my wife @steva once I'm back home and have had one too many

Kezzera 2025-07-28 10:10 p.m.

withdraw this immediately

ian 2025-07-28 10:10 p.m.

I withdraw

ian 2025-07-28 10:10 p.m.

I will attend healthy productive counseling

Kezzera 2025-07-28 10:10 p.m.

you should not be saying that kind of crap in open court

Kezzera 2025-07-28 10:11 p.m.

i know you're ragebaiting, just file the motions

ian 2025-07-28 10:11 p.m.

Was the joke so bad it made you think Im ragebaiting

Kezzera 2025-07-28 10:12 p.m.

well, 1: it cannot be seen as a joke, 2: even if it was, it's in extremely poor taste

Kezzera 2025-07-28 10:13 p.m.

you didnt mean it, and it was clearly trying to get a reaction out of me

Kezzera 2025-07-28 10:13 p.m.

sounds like ragebaiting

ian 2025-07-28 11:15 p.m.

@Kezzera

ian 2025-07-28 11:16 p.m.

this motion is redacted/sealed

ian 2025-07-28 11:16 p.m.

would you like me to send the unredacted/unsealed version in your DMs or in the private chamber thread

Kezzera

@Surge

@HectorMonkeyMoves

@orange please accept a friend request from this discord account: upyf

orange 2025-07-28 11:17 p.m.

Respectfully your honor what’s the purpose of this

Kezzera

we have a court rule that requires parties meet together and try to resolve issues before one side files the paperwork raising those issues formally

ian 2025-07-28 11:18 p.m.

orange 2025-07-28 11:18 p.m.

My dms are just off he’s not blocked; due to the nature of my employment I don’t have anyone dm me unless it’s very important

orange 2025-07-28 11:18 p.m.

I can’t risk that being clogged with nonsense

orange 2025-07-28 11:18 p.m.

ian 2025-07-28 11:19 p.m.

it's not going to be needed, like I said

ian 2025-07-28 11:19 p.m.

@Kezzera

I forgot to put it in there actually but the motion should also be construed as a request to ignore the meet and confer requirement

ian 2025-07-28 11:19 p.m.

given the time sensitive nature of the motion

ian 2025-07-28 11:20 p.m.

Im going to sleep

ian 2025-07-28 11:25 p.m.

@Kezzera

unless you can review quickly and rule now I have to sleep and by the time I'm available again and out of school the motion's sensitive time requirement will have expired

orange 2025-07-28 11:30 p.m.

Hello your honor

orange 2025-07-28 11:30 p.m.

I am unable to find counsel

orange 2025-07-28 11:31 p.m.

Can I get a public defender

ian 2025-07-28 11:31 p.m.

orange 2025-07-28 11:31 p.m.

I am afforded the right to attain counsel and I would like a lawyer present to make the legal process less stressful

orange 2025-07-28 11:31 p.m.

I hope that can be done

ian 2025-07-28 11:32 p.m.

This is the last comment I will make regarding the subject to avoid cross talk. But you are absolutely not afforded that right here, typically you have to proceed pro se in these scenarios (this is a simple EPO, not even difficult)

orange 2025-07-28 11:32 p.m.

I’m talking about the case as a whole counselor.

ian

@Kezzera unless you can review quickly and rule now I have to sleep and by the time I'm available again and out of school the motion's sensitive time requirement will ...

ian 2025-07-28 11:32 p.m.

@Kezzera

are you there

orange

I’m talking about the case as a whole counselor.

ian 2025-07-28 11:34 p.m.

@Kezzera

just so there's no confusion (I believe you know this, but to restate) at least so far this is not a civil lawsuit, it is an EPO proceeding. If we intend on bringing a lawsuit later, it will be our choice, and we will even file it separately to this

ian 2025-07-28 11:34 p.m.

Im sure you know even if it was a civil lawsuit he wouldnt have a right to counsel

orange 2025-07-28 11:34 p.m.

Still want a lawyer

ian 2025-07-28 11:34 p.m.

No further comment

ian 2025-07-28 11:34 p.m.

Please reply to the motion I sent

ian 2025-07-28 11:53 p.m.

@Kezzera

motion !

Surge 2025-07-29 05:52 a.m.

ian 2025-07-29 06:45 a.m.

@Kezzera

I DON'T HAVE SCHOOL TODAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ian 2025-07-29 06:46 a.m.

https://tenor.com/view/messi-levantando-a-ta%C3%A7a-gif-27264724

ian 2025-07-29 06:46 a.m.

Please review the motion

orange

Can I get a public defender

Kezzera 2025-07-29 11:39 a.m.

You are not entitled to one but I can refer you to low-cost services or refer you to legal-advertisements where you should find one

Kezzera 2025-07-29 11:39 a.m.

additionally you may have someone from the executive government who may be able to help you

orange 2025-07-29 11:40 a.m.

ill justprovide pro se

orange 2025-07-29 11:40 a.m.

DONT CARE ANYMORE

orange 2025-07-29 11:40 a.m.

Proceed

Kezzera 2025-07-29 11:40 a.m.

Are you sure

orange 2025-07-29 11:40 a.m.

Yea

Kezzera 2025-07-29 11:40 a.m.

You do understand the consequences of that as well correct

Kezzera 2025-07-29 11:40 a.m.

orange 2025-07-29 11:40 a.m.

Please dont fine me i dont want ato go bank rupt

Kezzera 2025-07-29 11:41 a.m.

Very unlikely to be fined unless you violate the order

ian 2025-07-29 11:41 a.m.

@Kezzera

@orange

sorry to say it here, but we are having a huge judicial attorney party at the hamilton and wexler building in Mersea, biggest server, if you want to come

orange 2025-07-29 11:41 a.m.

Kezzera 2025-07-29 11:41 a.m.

For reasons of avoiding impropriety and any perception of bias or interest I cannot be in attendance

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-29 11:41 a.m.

most useful npz message

orange 2025-07-29 11:42 a.m.

@Nublets

Hey wanna represent me

Kezzera 2025-07-29 11:42 a.m.

yes

orange 2025-07-29 11:42 a.m.

add nublets to this channel your honor

Kezzera 2025-07-29 11:42 a.m.

please don't provide me any information about things outside of this case, thank you

orange 2025-07-29 11:42 a.m.

the god damn lieutenant governor

Kezzera 2025-07-29 11:42 a.m.

Governor

Kezzera 2025-07-29 11:42 a.m.

Do you feel you would be better off with representation

Kezzera 2025-07-29 11:42 a.m.

or do you truly believe you can deal with this on your own

Kezzera 2025-07-29 11:43 a.m.

If you cannot find anyone at all to help you then I will consider appointing one

Kezzera 2025-07-29 11:43 a.m.

and they will be appointed for the purpose of preserving your rights

Kezzera 2025-07-29 11:43 a.m.

I remind you that I have a legal duty to ensure that

orange 2025-07-29 11:43 a.m.

Can i be given a few minutes to ponder

Kezzera 2025-07-29 11:43 a.m.

Take your time and tag me when ready

ian 2025-07-29 11:51 a.m.

@Kezzera

ian 2025-07-29 11:51 a.m.

no access to speak in thread

ian 2025-07-29 11:51 a.m.

please give me access

ian 2025-07-29 11:54 a.m.

@Kezzera

orange 2025-07-29 12:09 p.m.

i would like a court appointed attonrey @Kezzera

Kezzera 2025-07-29 12:09 p.m.

Kezzera 2025-07-29 12:15 p.m.

Do you swear or affirm that you have attempted to seek counsel from all available resources, and that you were explicitly refused service or otherwise ignored by the people you have approached?

Do you swear or affirm that your rights are better represented through the advice of a lawyer, and that pro se is not in your best interests, and that your rights would likely be jeopardized without access to a lawyer in this specific, unique case?

Do you swear or affirm that you do not have a right to a lawyer in these proceedings generally and that one is being provided to you at the expense of the Court, and such lawyer is going to be instructed solely to preserve your rights?

Kezzera 2025-07-29 12:15 p.m.

@orange

orange 2025-07-29 12:18 p.m.

Yes

Kezzera 2025-07-29 12:18 p.m.

To each question please

orange 2025-07-29 12:18 p.m.

Do you swear or affirm that you have attempted to seek counsel from all available resources, and that you were explicitly refused service or otherwise ignored by the people you have approached?

Yes I do

Do you swear or affirm that your rights are better represented through the advice of a lawyer, and that pro se is not in your best interests, and that your rights would likely be jeopardized without access to a lawyer in this specific, unique case?

Yes I do

Do you swear or affirm that you do not have a right to a lawyer in these proceedings generally and that one is being provided to you at the expense of the Court, and such lawyer is going to be instructed solely to preserve your rights?

Yes I do

Kezzera

Do you swear or affirm that you have attempted to seek counsel from all available resources, and that you were explicitly refused service or otherwise ignored by the people you hav...

ian 2025-07-29 12:27 p.m.

I believe we're deviating from the sixth amendment here

ian 2025-07-29 12:27 p.m.

he has to proceed pro se if no one wants his case

ian 2025-07-29 12:27 p.m.

I've not heard of it being standard practice that he is appointed one in a civil proceeding to preserve his rights

Kezzera 2025-07-29 12:27 p.m.

It's exceptional

Kezzera 2025-07-29 12:27 p.m.

I find this exceptional

orange 2025-07-29 12:36 p.m.

6TH AMENDMENT SAYS I HAVE RIGHT TO LEGAL COUNSEL. . .

Kezzera 2025-07-29 12:37 p.m.

ORDER is entered inviting Limited Appearance of Counsel for Orangebear22 only(edited)

ian 2025-07-29 12:38 p.m.

"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to ... have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence."

Kezzera

ORDER is entered inviting Limited Appearance of Counsel for Orangebear22 only(edited)

ian 2025-07-29 12:38 p.m.

is it on the website

Kezzera 2025-07-29 12:41 p.m.

Entering

Kezzera 2025-07-29 12:41 p.m.

You need to submit your stuff on th ewebsite too

ian 2025-07-29 12:42 p.m.

Ok I will

orange 2025-07-29 12:43 p.m.

@Kezzera

Hello your honor

orange 2025-07-29 12:43 p.m.

My attorney is @robert

ian 2025-07-29 12:44 p.m.

@Kezzera

your honor the governor has perjured himself

ian 2025-07-29 12:44 p.m.

Clearly he had not exhausted all available resources to seek counsel when he swore to it under oath

orange 2025-07-29 12:44 p.m.

um i did-

orange 2025-07-29 12:45 p.m.

he just dmed me after seeing this channel

orange 2025-07-29 12:45 p.m.

>.<

orange 2025-07-29 12:45 p.m.

hamilton cases are closed why would i have had bothered

orange 2025-07-29 12:45 p.m.

=>w<=

ian 2025-07-29 12:45 p.m.

is the head of like the second largest law firm in the state

orange

hamilton cases are closed why would i have had bothered

ian 2025-07-29 12:45 p.m.

Are they

orange Server2025-07-29 12:46 p.m.

orange

hamilton cases are closed why would i have had bothered

orange 2025-07-29 12:46 p.m.

consultations *

orange 2025-07-29 12:47 p.m.

not u thinking u clocked me

orange 2025-07-29 12:47 p.m.

pls--

orange 2025-07-29 12:48 p.m.

https://tenor.com/view/stan-twitter-jennie-jennie-kim-jennie-mantra-blackpink-jennie-gif-3615726359861208877

Kezzera 2025-07-29 12:53 p.m.

yes i appointed robert

Kezzera used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-29 12:53 p.m.

Case Modified

@Kezzera

has added @robert to the case channel.

Kezzera 2025-07-29 12:53 p.m.

file a NOA for the record, thanks

robert 2025-07-29 12:53 p.m.

Hello, Your Honor.

robert 2025-07-29 12:53 p.m.

Will do.

Kezzera 2025-07-29 12:53 p.m.

Hello

robert 2025-07-29 12:59 p.m.

robert

Click to see attachment.

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:04 p.m.

added to website, file there

robert 2025-07-29 01:17 p.m.

@Kezzera

Your Honor, I plan to have a response and motion filed shortly. If you could please provide me any important dates so I am aware of what and when I need it to be done.

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:18 p.m.

I'm looking for an August 2, 2025 show cause hearing for the EPO

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:18 p.m.

There is nothing else pending specifically for your client(edited)

robert 2025-07-29 01:18 p.m.

Thank you.

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:19 p.m.

You're welcome counsel

orange

https://tenor.com/view/stan-twitter-jennie-jennie-kim-jennie-mantra-blackpink-jennie-gif-3615726359861208877

ian 2025-07-29 01:21 p.m.

@Kezzera

I believe you said three days for this type of behavior

orange

https://tenor.com/view/stan-twitter-jennie-jennie-kim-jennie-mantra-blackpink-jennie-gif-3615726359861208877

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:24 p.m.

@orange

orange 2025-07-29 01:24 p.m.

Yes your honor

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:24 p.m.

copy @robert

Kezzera

copy @robert

robert 2025-07-29 01:26 p.m.

Your Honor, I'd like to apologise on behalf of my client. As you may or may not have noticed he doesn't have a good understanding of the court(s), and I've informed him of his rights and respect moving forward. He filed that GIF before I entered the chamber.

robert 2025-07-29 01:26 p.m.

I'd also like to apologise to opposing counsel if this has affected him. @ian

robert 2025-07-29 01:26 p.m.

Onwards and upwards, gentleman.

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:26 p.m.

I'm happy with that

robert

Your Honor, I'd like to apologise on behalf of my client. As you may or may not have noticed he doesn't have a good understanding of the court(s), and I've informed him of his righ...

ian 2025-07-29 01:26 p.m.

Your honor

ian 2025-07-29 01:27 p.m.

Orangebear has consistently been ordered to cease crosstalk and offensive comments

ian 2025-07-29 01:27 p.m.

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:27 p.m.

Well there's no more excuse now

ian 2025-07-29 01:27 p.m.

Also

ian 2025-07-29 01:27 p.m.

I'd like to note that he is quite literally bar certified

ian 2025-07-29 01:28 p.m.

I won't contest that being certified is not equal to not needing outside representation

ian 2025-07-29 01:28 p.m.

But it does mean you have at least a decent understanding of the courts

ian 2025-07-29 01:28 p.m.

an understanding that is sufficient to know that you can't do what you've been told not to do three times

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:28 p.m.

@orange

are you a certified attorney in the state?

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:28 p.m.

@robert

copy

ian 2025-07-29 01:29 p.m.

Those photos were taken in the courts', DOJ and Bar discord servers, Y'r H'n'r

ian 2025-07-29 01:29 p.m.

He is certified

ian 2025-07-29 01:29 p.m.

In fact, his bar no. is 1019362

ian 2025-07-29 01:29 p.m.

@Kezzera

orange 2025-07-29 01:30 p.m.

I’ve been certified for years but I haven’t practiced law once

ian 2025-07-29 01:30 p.m.

You're certified

orange 2025-07-29 01:31 p.m.

im the governor of the state of mayflower; I have no time or capacity for the legal mumbo jumbo of our state

orange 2025-07-29 01:31 p.m.

To the court: I am sorry for my comments

ian 2025-07-29 01:31 p.m.

The state bar doesn't certify individuals that are incapable of following a strict directive of explicit nature which was given multiple times

ian 2025-07-29 01:31 p.m.

Your honor

ian 2025-07-29 01:31 p.m.

Orangebear knew he had to behave and didn't

ian 2025-07-29 01:31 p.m.

You yourself said he is worthy of contempt

orange

im the governor of the state of mayflower; I have no time or capacity for the legal mumbo jumbo of our state

ian 2025-07-29 01:32 p.m.

Do you not sign senate bills into law

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:32 p.m.

Going forward, @orange you should start discussing this matter with your lawyer and likely use him to the extent you can

ian 2025-07-29 01:32 p.m.

Do you not execute

the law

(edited)

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:32 p.m.

I do find it troubling

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:32 p.m.

ok np, stop

orange 2025-07-29 01:32 p.m.

All matters will go through my lawyer thank you your honor

ian 2025-07-29 01:32 p.m.

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:32 p.m.

We get it

Kezzera

ok np, stop

ian 2025-07-29 01:33 p.m.

I prefer npz if you could

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:33 p.m.

I can hold you in contempt now if I wanted to, especially if you are a licensed attorney

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:33 p.m.

Governor

orange 2025-07-29 01:33 p.m.

I understand your honor

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:33 p.m.

but because of how the constitution works, and how constitutional theory can be strongly tested for what I am able to do

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:33 p.m.

I will not do it

ian 2025-07-29 01:34 p.m.

I strongly dissent your honor

robert 2025-07-29 01:34 p.m.

Counseller, I'm glad you're concerned for my client and his position he holds. We have apologised, and can assure the oppositition and this honorable judge that we won't make any further unnecessary comments in ~~his~~ this chamber.(edited)

orange 2025-07-29 01:34 p.m.

My recklessness will cease now that I have an active attorney on my case

orange 2025-07-29 01:34 p.m.

Thank you

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:34 p.m.

You have had, several times in the past, acted in a way which caused disruption to this particular court - I want to see you stop doing that today

orange 2025-07-29 01:34 p.m.

Yes your honor

robert

Counseller, I'm glad you're concerned for my client and his position he holds. We have apologised, and can assure the oppositition and this honorable judge that we won't make any f...(edited)

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:34 p.m.

I'm fine with that

ian

I strongly dissent your honor

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:34 p.m.

I believe in the interest of expedience, time and energy for all of us

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:34 p.m.

and to also not lose focus

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:35 p.m.

I think our attention is better placed on the case itself

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:35 p.m.

I just needed the back and forth to stop mostly

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:35 p.m.

and it's heading towards that

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:36 p.m.

Blips occur, but fuck me just stop the lot of you

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:36 p.m.

hurling shit at eachother thinking it's funny

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:38 p.m.

For those who do not take this seriously: if you have nothing constructive to tell the Court or anyone involved in the case, you are advised not to say anything unless you are told to by the Court

For those who do take this seriously: your continued compliance is appreciated, and any one who provided relevant information then decided to do throw a GIF straight after to mock opposing counsel should now stop

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:38 p.m.

the best time was to stop long ago, the second best time is now

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:38 p.m.

there is no third best time

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:38 p.m.

I'll note that if contempt occurs and it causes a disruption to representation, we have to enter continuances(edited)

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:38 p.m.

and that is not in anyone's interest

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:40 p.m.

i don't know why anyone finds it funny to do the very things i tell you guys to not do, but it's disruptive and fucking stupid

Kezzera 2025-07-29 01:41 p.m.

I don't know how many times I have to tell you all that and make it obvious that I don't condone that kind of crap. Cut the habit now

ian 2025-07-29 02:07 p.m.

@Kezzera

@robert

@HectorMonkeyMoves

@Surge

ian 2025-07-29 02:07 p.m.

we withdraw our motion to expedite and our motion for in-chamber review

ian 2025-07-29 02:36 p.m.

@Kezzera

ian 2025-07-29 03:08 p.m.

@Kezzera

Surge 2025-07-29 05:09 p.m.

me showing up to court

Surge

me showing up to court

ian 2025-07-29 05:13 p.m.

@Kezzera

pls contempt

ian

@Kezzera pls contempt

Surge 2025-07-29 05:16 p.m.

@Kezzera

hey i have some crazy documents i need to submit the court

Surge

Click to see attachment.

ian 2025-07-29 05:16 p.m.

@Kezzera

please contempt!!

Surge 2025-07-29 05:16 p.m.

urgency level maxiumum

ian 2025-07-29 06:05 p.m.

@Kezzera

ian 2025-07-29 06:11 p.m.

@Kezzera

Surge 2025-07-29 06:34 p.m.

https://gyazo.com/bd906d6c45262ba46ed71468a56734b7

Gyazo Screen Video

Kezzera 2025-07-29 07:13 p.m.

@Surge

@HectorMonkeyMoves

npz moves to enter a court order temporarily prohibiting payment of taghuers's bounty

Kezzera 2025-07-29 07:13 p.m.

do any or both of you object to this? if yes, why?

Kezzera 2025-07-29 07:14 p.m.

if not, then indicate so

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-29 07:14 p.m.

we weren't paying out for it in the first place, an announcement was made days ago and @honkhonk happens to be in the server and is aware of this being the case as for our way of showing the courts that we have been following the EPO, your honor

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-29 07:15 p.m.

they were invited once the EPO became active in order to show we were following it

Kezzera 2025-07-29 07:15 p.m.

the petitioner and their attorney?

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-29 07:15 p.m.

No, just @honkhonk

Kezzera 2025-07-29 07:15 p.m.

okay

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-29 07:15 p.m.

We feel no need to let the petitioner and their attorney inside of TBH

Kezzera 2025-07-29 07:16 p.m.

do you object to the court order temporarily preventing the payment then, it won't really change anything other than just reaffirm what you have been doing

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-29 07:16 p.m.

so long as another individual of the courts is in it to hold us accountable

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-29 07:16 p.m.

We have no objections, especially given we took steps to follow the order when it was first announced

Kezzera 2025-07-29 07:16 p.m.

okay, i will enter it then

Kezzera 2025-07-29 07:16 p.m.

there is a formal request being made by petitioner's attorney to "clarify" the original EPO

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-29 07:16 p.m.

if you would like a date as to when we did so I can provide a screenshot of when I invited them

Kezzera 2025-07-29 07:17 p.m.

sure, that'd be good thanks

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-29 07:17 p.m.

am I able to just send it here?

Kezzera 2025-07-29 07:17 p.m.

i'll take it in here yes

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-29 07:17 p.m.

Kezzera 2025-07-29 07:18 p.m.

@ian

@Surge

@HectorMonkeyMoves

ORDER is entered preventing the payout of the $50,000 bounty for the death and harm of Petitioner taghuers. Temporary and is in effect until motion for clarification decided.(edited)

Kezzera 2025-07-29 07:38 p.m.

order on website

Kezzera

@ian

@Surge

@HectorMonkeyMoves ORDER is entered preventing the payout of the $50,000 bounty for the death and harm of Petitioner taghuers. Temp...(edited)

ian 2025-07-29 07:43 p.m.

thank you your honor

Surge 2025-07-29 08:10 p.m.

we already did the retroactive payments within the first 30 minutes of his cancellation

Surge 2025-07-29 08:10 p.m.

what a waste of court resources

ian 2025-07-29 08:31 p.m.

@Kezzera

The standard for a claimant to claim that a Respondent to an injunction has violated is of compelling evidence.

ian 2025-07-29 08:33 p.m.

Given TBH only does its payments in bulk during specific points in time, I believe it is very unlikely that they switched up their traditional routine to instead compensate these bounty hunters immediately after the bounty was cancelled. It just seems too convenient to be true. I know it's the lie I'd make if I had to.

ian 2025-07-29 08:33 p.m.

As such I personally there is compelling evidence to believe DownSurge and TBH have violated the EPO and following procedural order.

ian 2025-07-29 08:35 p.m.

The standard then turns on them to show and prove that they have not, indeed, violated it—in this situation, that would come as the Respondents showing any proof of when they actually paid the bounty hunters, such as videographical evidence (clips) or message history with the same

ian 2025-07-29 08:35 p.m.

If you want, I can put this in a written motion

Kezzera 2025-07-29 08:43 p.m.

Since Mr. Surge's comment has been made directly in my presence I will not require it(edited)

Kezzera 2025-07-29 08:43 p.m.

in writing

Surge

we already did the retroactive payments within the first 30 minutes of his cancellation

Kezzera 2025-07-29 08:44 p.m.

I will note this comment by Mr. Surge

ian

Given TBH only does its payments in bulk during specific points in time, I believe it is very unlikely that they switched up their traditional routine to instead compensate these b...

Kezzera 2025-07-29 08:46 p.m.

You would need to provide proof of this bulk schedule

Kezzera 2025-07-29 08:46 p.m.

somehow

Kezzera 2025-07-29 08:47 p.m.

Someone has to be named, or there should be some hard evidence showing this

Kezzera

You would need to provide proof of this bulk schedule

ian 2025-07-29 08:50 p.m.

may I provide it in camera

ian 2025-07-29 08:50 p.m.

Ive already discussed this

ian 2025-07-29 08:50 p.m.

it's the same evidence

ian 2025-07-29 08:50 p.m.

maybe one or two additional things that Ill post here instead

Kezzera 2025-07-29 08:51 p.m.

No in-camera

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-29 09:05 p.m.

Your honor, I would like to note that Surge has made an error in his comment and we would like to extend an apology to the Court and Petitioner's attorney. We also raise that there was no Order explicitly prohibiting us to pay anyone after I had pinged the members of the server to cease going after Tagheurs, but in showing respect to the Court's authority any payments pending were to be stopped regardless when the EPO came out. We are trying to comply with the Order the best we can, and it can be a little confusing at times. Please show us mercy this time.

Kezzera 2025-07-29 09:09 p.m.

Well you can't prove something that didn't happen and it's extremely odd why Surge would say what he said, and Petitioner's counsel seems to have strong doubts as well

Kezzera 2025-07-29 09:09 p.m.

I may ask at some point to inspect the server for compliance, or have @honkhonk declare compliance as she is my eyes and ears in this

Kezzera 2025-07-29 09:10 p.m.

Please avoid from making those kinds of comments again. Stuff said here can be used as evidence.

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-29 09:10 p.m.

That is why we invited her, rather than the Petitioner and his counsel, given a lack of bias(edited)

Kezzera 2025-07-29 09:10 p.m.

That's fine

Kezzera 2025-07-29 09:10 p.m.

I will at some point today ask Ashley to verify that payments have not gone out

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-29 09:13 p.m.

Ashley has admin within TBH and can go through the entire clips channel that we use for our payouts

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-29 09:13 p.m.

needless to say, we are remaining open and compliant with the courts

ian 2025-07-29 09:17 p.m.

@Kezzera

if ashley is being given access do you still want me to provide evidence

ian 2025-07-29 09:17 p.m.

that they do bulkl payments

ian 2025-07-29 09:17 p.m.

or just

ian 2025-07-29 09:17 p.m.

@HectorMonkeyMoves

you do bulk payments right

ian 2025-07-29 09:17 p.m.

surge pays everybody who did a hit at a set date that reoccurs, right

HectorMonkeyMoves

Ashley has admin within TBH and can go through the entire clips channel that we use for our payouts

Kezzera 2025-07-29 09:33 p.m.

Fine by me

ian

@Kezzera if ashley is being given access do you still want me to provide evidence

Kezzera 2025-07-29 09:34 p.m.

It would come up in the compliance inspection

Surge 2025-07-29 10:55 p.m.

think i care

Surge 2025-07-29 10:55 p.m.

you want to see hellfire

Surge 2025-07-29 10:55 p.m.

terrible things are about to happen

Kezzera 2025-07-29 11:23 p.m.

Mr. Surge, please

ian 2025-07-29 11:24 p.m.

@Kezzera

your honor please hold Mr Surge in contempt

ian 2025-07-29 11:24 p.m.

He has been continuously sending disrespectful gifs after being told not to

ian 2025-07-29 11:24 p.m.

And images and videos

ian 2025-07-29 11:24 p.m.

In direct defiance of your explicit order

Surge 2025-07-29 11:38 p.m.

if shes 14 im 88(edited)

Surge 2025-07-29 11:38 p.m.

@Kezzera

i want this in official court documents

Surge

if shes 14 im 88(edited)

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-29 11:49 p.m.

I agree

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-29 11:49 p.m.

if shes Total im ND

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-29 11:50 p.m.

@Kezzera

add this too

ian 2025-07-29 11:56 p.m.

@Kezzera

again I request Mr Moves and Mr Surge be held in contempt for disrespectful statements to the court

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-29 11:56 p.m.

How can you ask for us to be held in contempt when you deliberately called everyone within this case retarded?

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-29 11:57 p.m.

the irony is insane

HectorMonkeyMoves

How can you ask for us to be held in contempt when you deliberately called everyone within this case retarded?

ian 2025-07-29 11:59 p.m.

I believe that incident was 5 days ago if I'm not mistaken

ian 2025-07-30 12:00 a.m.

you and Mr Surge have been consistently disrespecting the court for days on end

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-30 12:01 a.m.

if i’m not mistaken… you have done the same, so frankly this is very hypocritical

ian 2025-07-30 12:01 a.m.

perhaps you didn't see it, but I addressed that quite literally three messages ago

ian 2025-07-30 12:02 a.m.

so yes you are mistaken

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-30 12:03 a.m.

3 messages ago all you did was ask for us to be held in contempt… so you are quite literally wrong

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:18 a.m.

@HectorMonkeyMoves

@Surge

You both are found in contempt for breaching my chambers' rules. I am handing down a sentence of 3 days. I warned that this crap should not have continued.

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:19 a.m.

Unacceptable

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:19 a.m.

Get a grip, both of you

Surge 2025-07-30 01:29 a.m.

https://gyazo.com/a755b0d59e8e94f0b3b8dca5c9cc6d18

Gyazo

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:30 a.m.

holy fucking shit..

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-30 01:39 a.m.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1392291573764722889/1392996151812165734/232.gif

robert 2025-07-30 01:40 a.m.

HectorMonkeyMoves 2025-07-30 01:42 a.m.

npz_v and blackmail

ian 2025-07-30 10:28 a.m.

@Kezzera

hi your honor, I just woke up and I think some context is in order. I started suing orangebear from the get go for revoking residency from my client, just that this TBH thing took priority. I helped my client for free and didn't charge him anything. Though we could, for sure, obtain a lot of money given the governor of mayflower solicited the death of my client and violated his most simple rights, my client doesn't care about that. He only cared about getting his residency back so he could be an upstanding citizen and vote

ian 2025-07-30 10:31 a.m.

I had wanted to be a magistrate for a long time, and eventually I found out orangebear was not going to nominate me in retaliation for this case. So I told my client and he suggested we drop the money claims. By this point, all residencies were reinstated because of a prior court order, so he didn't need it for anything anymore other than money. I thanked him, and I did ask orangebear if he would reconsider nominating me, as petty and corrupt as he is, if I dropped the claims against him to pursue my dream of becoming a magistrate

ian 2025-07-30 10:39 a.m.

Orange didn't want to, so I asked his friend surge, hoping he would convince him and explaining why it'd be good for him too (not having to pay my client)

ian 2025-07-30 10:39 a.m.

My conversation with Surge was actually quite lengthy because unlike Orange his dms were on

ian 2025-07-30 10:43 a.m.

It's unfortunate that he chose to screenshot the most awkward snippet of the entire conversation—an out of context one that framed me as a blackmailer, and not as somebody who did what he had to do against corruption when the odds were stacked against him, and almost heroically always remaining on ethical grounds

ian 2025-07-30 10:44 a.m.

I understand the urge to comment on the situation as the presiding judge. But given the specific case I was referencing hasn't even made it to a docket yet (and it isn't this one, this is an EPO proceeding) I would ask we remain respectful and that, if Mr Surge or Orange so wish, a report is directly forwarded to the bar instead. These proceedings should continue intactc

ian 2025-07-30 10:44 a.m.

intact*

Surge

we already did the retroactive payments within the first 30 minutes of his cancellation

ian 2025-07-30 11:02 a.m.

@Kezzera

if we may continue, this is Surge saying that they paid perpetrators who killed my client

HectorMonkeyMoves

Your honor, I would like to note that Surge has made an error in his comment and we would like to extend an apology to the Court and Petitioner's attorney. We also raise that there...

ian 2025-07-30 11:03 a.m.

This is Moves saying Surge made a mistake. Indeed, they DIDN'T pay perpetrators who killed my client

ian 2025-07-30 11:04 a.m.

These are my DMs with Mr pmgb5, responsible for killing my client at least twice (or thrice)

ian 2025-07-30 11:04 a.m.

I've successfully ragebaited him into accidentally revealing that he was, in fact, paid

ian 2025-07-30 11:06 a.m.

I don't know whether the payments were in violation of the court order or not. That would depend on when the payments were actually made. The indisputable truth, however, is that Mr Moves has unmistakably made false statements to the court deliberately, and that, indirectly and by omission, so has Mr Surge

ian 2025-07-30 11:06 a.m.

I ask you hold them both in further contempt

ian 2025-07-30 11:08 a.m.

I'd, then, like for them to be required to prove that this payment was not in violation of the court order. The burden of proof is on THEM at the moment. If they cannot prove these payments that they lied to the court about were made before the procedural order, I ask they be held in contempt even for longer

Kezzera

I'm looking for an August 2, 2025 show cause hearing for the EPO

orange 2025-07-30 12:30 p.m.

I would not be available on this day your honor. Could we push it to August 3rd?

ian 2025-07-30 12:31 p.m.

Do my eyes deceive me

ian 2025-07-30 12:31 p.m.

Is orangebear asking to change the date four whole days after it was set?

orange 2025-07-30 12:32 p.m.

I don’t know what you mean counselor. His message was yesterday @ 10:18 AM PST, not even 24 hours ago.

ian 2025-07-30 12:32 p.m.

Surely your attorney will be in attendance. You've neglected saying you were unavailable for four days so it's on you

orange 2025-07-30 12:32 p.m.

Please stop speaking to me. You’re not allowed to crosstalk.

orange

I don’t know what you mean counselor. His message was yesterday @ 10:18 AM PST, not even 24 hours ago.

ian 2025-07-30 12:32 p.m.

Evidently you didn't even read the order

ian 2025-07-30 12:33 p.m.

@Kezzera

it seems orangebear has not written the order that literally said "READ THIS ORDER VERY CAREFULLY" in full caps and bold letters

orange 2025-07-30 12:33 p.m.

Contempt him @Kezzera he’s ragebaiting

ian 2025-07-30 12:34 p.m.

I'm not ragebaiting at all. You didn't read the order (in clear defiance of the court), didn't know what you were supposed to do, and once you found out what it was, you asked to delay and postpone the proceedings at our expense four whole days after the fact.

ian 2025-07-30 12:35 p.m.

@Kezzera

I'm clearly not ragebaiting. I don't ragebait in open court, I've said this before. Ever. Orangebear's ask that I be contempted for ragebait is, in itself, ragebait—that, coupled with the fact he has not read the order that said "READ THIS ORDER VERY CAREFULLY" to me is grounds for contempt

ian 2025-07-30 12:36 p.m.

I thoroughly object to any postponing of the date of the OSC at this time.

ian 2025-07-30 12:36 p.m.

It is about time these disrespectful Respondents acknowledge the authority of the court.

robert 2025-07-30 12:37 p.m.

Counsellor,

robert 2025-07-30 12:38 p.m.

nevermind

ian 2025-07-30 12:39 p.m.

Literally no counter to my argument

robert 2025-07-30 12:40 p.m.

no arguement needed

ian 2025-07-30 12:40 p.m.

Your client just admitted he did not read the very order that said to READ IT VERY CAREFULLY IN BOLD letters

ian 2025-07-30 12:40 p.m.

Additionally he is asking for baseless contempt?

ian 2025-07-30 12:40 p.m.

And saying four days after the fact he can't attend the session

ian 2025-07-30 12:41 p.m.

This level of carelessness toward the court's authority, at this level of power, as the Governor of the state, is simply utterly unacceptable. There are no other words. There is clearly no other remedy than sending him to jail for a few days to reconsider.

ian 2025-07-30 12:41 p.m.

@Kezzera

ian 2025-07-30 12:44 p.m.

You're clearly bamboozled at the situation, counsellor, I would be too if my client had just embarrassed himself like this. But I do urge you to stop repeatedly triggering Discord's mechanism of informing other users that you are typing, which makes me think that you are going to counter my argument, when you are, in fact, not going to reply at all

ian 2025-07-30 12:45 p.m.

I need to go get ready and I'm waiting to see what you'll rebut with, and then "RobertSabbatini is typing..." just disappears

robert 2025-07-30 12:45 p.m.

There's no rebut

robert 2025-07-30 12:45 p.m.

i cannot attend a hearing at 7am my time it's not happening

robert 2025-07-30 12:46 p.m.

I kindly request that this court add a short continuance and we re schedule the hearing so both parties can attend

robert 2025-07-30 12:51 p.m.

if the court would like this on paper, i'm happy to do so

robert

There's no rebut

ian 2025-07-30 01:01 p.m.

I don't blame you

ian 2025-07-30 01:02 p.m.

@Kezzera

I don't object to the rescheduling because Robert nor Orange can't attend the hearing. We can't have a hearing without one of the parties. But given Orange didn't read this court's order, he is still deserving of sanctions(edited)

robert 2025-07-30 01:02 p.m.

he read his order?

robert 2025-07-30 01:02 p.m.

im unsure where you are getting all this from

ian 2025-07-30 01:03 p.m.

Clearly he is only now finding out that there is a hearing set for August 2nd

ian 2025-07-30 01:03 p.m.

As if he hadn't read the original order! So odd!

ian 2025-07-30 01:04 p.m.

I've said what I needed to say, the court can deliberate
We should speak in DMs if you disagree

ian

intact*

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:19 p.m.

I disagree

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:20 p.m.

I'm strongly inclined to consider dismissing these proceedings for abuse of process

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:20 p.m.

This is just outrageous

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:20 p.m.

What other lawsuit do you have against orangebear that warrants you to also talk to Surge?

Kezzera

This is just outrageous

ian 2025-07-30 01:21 p.m.

It's really not...
Orange didn't want to nominate me in retaliation because of these proceedings. So I offered to drop them in exchange for re-consideration, with my client's consent

ian 2025-07-30 01:21 p.m.

What Orange did, if anything, was corrupt and unethical

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:23 p.m.

Okay, and what you did is not corrupt and unethical as well?

ian

These are my DMs with Mr pmgb5, responsible for killing my client at least twice (or thrice)

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:28 p.m.

Why did you show this now

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:29 p.m.

fucking hell

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:30 p.m.

@ian

@orange

@HectorMonkeyMoves

@Surge

Until proper review of the whole proceedings can be completed, the Show Cause hearing scheduled for August 2, 2025 is vacated and cancelled until a new hearing date is scheduled or a different action is taken upon further Order of the Court.

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:30 p.m.

cc @robert LA Counsel for orangebear22

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:31 p.m.

Accordingly, a review is to be completed before August 2, 2025.

robert 2025-07-30 01:31 p.m.

Understood, Your Honor.

robert 2025-07-30 01:32 p.m.

For record purposes, I'd like the court to be aware my timezone is AEST.

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:32 p.m.

Thank you counsel we will keep that in mind

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:32 p.m.

No more explanations are required

Kezzera

Why did you show this now

ian 2025-07-30 01:33 p.m.

I just got it

ian 2025-07-30 01:33 p.m.

That's what I said

ian 2025-07-30 01:33 p.m.

I ragebaited him into revealing that they were paid

ian 2025-07-30 01:34 p.m.

I received it 2-3 hours ago and sent it here almost immediately

Kezzera

Okay, and what you did is not corrupt and unethical as well?

ian 2025-07-30 01:34 p.m.

No, it wasn't

ian 2025-07-30 01:34 p.m.

I'll elaborate

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:35 p.m.

No just

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:35 p.m.

stop

ian 2025-07-30 01:35 p.m.

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:35 p.m.

You can tell me when I ask you(edited)

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:35 p.m.

to speak

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:35 p.m.

about this

ian 2025-07-30 01:35 p.m.

You asked me I was answering

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:35 p.m.

I don't need the elaboration

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:36 p.m.

because I cannot reasonably see what you did can be redeemed in anyone's eyes

Kezzera

I don't need the elaboration

ian 2025-07-30 01:37 p.m.

Hardly fair

ian 2025-07-30 01:37 p.m.

Your honor

ian 2025-07-30 01:37 p.m.

I'm allowed to offer to drop cases for whatever reason that is not unethical, and with my client's consent

ian 2025-07-30 01:38 p.m.

So long as the proceedings weren't started with an ulterior motive, abuse of process doesn't fit. And they didn't. When I started these proceedings I had not even thought about being a magistrate.

ian 2025-07-30 01:41 p.m.

I don't think this should be dismissed sua sponte unless proper elaboration is given as to why, and there is simply no precedent regarding that. I was careful to be ethical throughout all times and I was

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:41 p.m.

It seems to me that there was an ulterior motive all along

ian 2025-07-30 01:42 p.m.

Well...you're mistaken

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:43 p.m.

Okay, then how does it make sense to justify your suit being allowed to proceed when there was no ulterior motive at the start of the suit, but then soon after there was an ulterior motive?

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:43 p.m.

That's not proper use of court process is it?

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:43 p.m.

Enlighten me please

Kezzera

Okay, then how does it make sense to justify your suit being allowed to proceed when there was no ulterior motive at the start of the suit, but then soon after there was an ulterio...

ian 2025-07-30 01:44 p.m.

Hardly an ulterior motive your honor

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:45 p.m.

Fine, elaborate

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:45 p.m.

How is it not?

ian 2025-07-30 01:45 p.m.

The case for damages would be pursued to get my client, well, his damages

ian 2025-07-30 01:45 p.m.

Because he deserves them and wants them because he was wronged

ian 2025-07-30 01:45 p.m.

BUT

ian 2025-07-30 01:47 p.m.

The fact is

ian 2025-07-30 01:47 p.m.

Since I'm helping him, that costs me my magistracy with orangebear because he is corrupt

ian 2025-07-30 01:47 p.m.

Since I've helped him throughout all of this for free, asking nothing in return, HE decided that, if it was possible, he would rather give that away to return to me my dream of becoming a magistrate

ian 2025-07-30 01:48 p.m.

If it not possible, he does want his rightful damages

ian 2025-07-30 01:48 p.m.

Either way, that is about a subsequent civil action for damages, NOT this EPO

ian 2025-07-30 01:48 p.m.

This EPO was never in question and I never offered to drop it or anything in the likes

ian 2025-07-30 01:49 p.m.

Which means at the moment, even if I had been unethical, which I haven't, the jurisdiction rests within the land of the state bar

ian 2025-07-30 01:49 p.m.

Or at the hands of this court once I do file a lawsuit, but I haven't yet

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:50 p.m.

And this Court has jurisdiction over the case and can still sanction you for this nonsense

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:50 p.m.

It still has jurisdiction over the EPO and all of its attached proceedings

ian 2025-07-30 01:50 p.m.

You would sanction me because of a case that hasn't been filed yet?

ian 2025-07-30 01:51 p.m.

I think it'd be an abuse of discretion to sanction me in a case for something that happened in another

ian 2025-07-30 01:51 p.m.

In fact, in one that is not in this court's jurisdiction yet

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:51 p.m.

I'd sanction you for your conduct towards the respondents

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:51 p.m.

I'll stop you there in fact

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:52 p.m.

I'm going to say some carefully but strongly worded things which will convey my utter disgust at your professional conduct

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:52 p.m.

and your lack of integrity

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:53 p.m.

and before that, i see opposing counsel is typing

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:53 p.m.

what is it?

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:54 p.m.

I'm going to say what I have to say after your message

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:54 p.m.

@robert

Spit it out

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:54 p.m.

come on

robert 2025-07-30 01:54 p.m.

Your Honor, my client has asked me to bring to the Court’s attention the following direct messages from opposing counsel. In those messages, counsel offers to withdraw these proceedings in exchange for a magistrate appointment. I believe this evidence raises serious questions about an improper motive and is worthy of the Court’s review.

ian 2025-07-30 01:55 p.m.

The court is already aware of that

ian 2025-07-30 01:55 p.m.

I mentioned it myself

robert 2025-07-30 01:55 p.m.

There's further issue(s) in your direct messages.

ian 2025-07-30 01:55 p.m.

robert 2025-07-30 01:55 p.m.

I can forward it

ian 2025-07-30 01:55 p.m.

I did mention the DMs

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:55 p.m.

This was a message with the Governor?

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:55 p.m.

Forward it

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:56 p.m.

I want to see

robert Server2025-07-30 01:56 p.m.

ian 2025-07-30 01:56 p.m.

Yeah I did mention that

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:56 p.m.

okay, I think i've seen and heard enough then

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:57 p.m.

I'll say what I need to say now

ian 2025-07-30 01:57 p.m.

It's the same thing I mentioned

ian 2025-07-30 01:57 p.m.

There's nothing new in that video but

ian 2025-07-30 01:57 p.m.

Kezzera 2025-07-30 01:57 p.m.

No but I think it reaffirms the situation

Kezzera 2025-07-30 02:06 p.m.

1. You justify your actions here because you are sacrificing your career ambitions to become a magistrate to help your client get what he deserves. I see that you can also easily choose to not help him to keep your ambitions to become a member of the judiciary by simply playing into the Governor's "corrupt hands".
1a. You should know that your bargaining for a public office in order to drop suit, not bring suit or otherwise do something to all current and future suits against the Governor or any of the Respondents is wrong and unethical. You should know that you have an obligation to inform your client that what he is allowing or offering to you is wrong and unethical. What you did was plainly blackmail. I am suspicious how your client would know about your ambitions and agree to allow it unless you raised it first -- it's a personal ambition.
2. It does not matter whether you raised this proposal for a future suit. I refer back to our first hearing in Lander where you answered a question about future proceedings raised by this Court, in that the EPO would contribute (more than likely) to the restoration of your client's residency, among other things. You mentioned that certain damages were likely to be sought there.
3. All of this and you, if I recall, backing out on this seeking of certain damages etc. in exchange for public office speaks volumes to your integrity. This can even amount to a breach of trust and confidence in the public.(edited)

Kezzera 2025-07-30 02:07 p.m.

If you want professional advice, here's mine: your lack of integrity will cost you, and you will bring everyone down with you through your lack of integrity. The law demands a jurist with ironclad principles who actually believe in fairness, selflessness and complete indifference to material influence -- almost like a monk. You need to re-evaluate everything about your conduct, today.

Kezzera 2025-07-30 02:08 p.m.

You can certainly improve, but what has been revealed to me shows that you are far from deserving of any respect as a jurist.

Kezzera 2025-07-30 02:08 p.m.

You should reflect on this and learn from your mistakes.

Kezzera 2025-07-30 02:09 p.m.

This is certainly your worst one yet and I have no doubt about it.

Kezzera 2025-07-30 02:10 p.m.

I am certainly not ready to be an accessory to any part of your scheme, or whatever the hell this is.

Kezzera 2025-07-30 02:10 p.m.

and I will no longer put this Court into any further disrepute than it already has been.

Kezzera 2025-07-30 02:13 p.m.

@Surge

@ian

@robert

(cc) @HectorMonkeyMoves

@orange

I order these proceedings be dismissed for abuse of process. I order the Emergency Protection Order vacated and cancelled entirely and all interim orders vacated and cancelled.

Clerk is directed to close these proceedings before end of day 11:59PM @Underprothonotary .

Surge 2025-07-30 02:14 p.m.

Thank you your Honor. Have a good day.

Kezzera 2025-07-30 02:14 p.m.

You're welcome

robert 2025-07-30 02:15 p.m.

We thank the Court's time. Thank you, Your Honor.

Kezzera 2025-07-30 02:15 p.m.

@robert

Your appearance is terminated as of today. Bills to be directed to this chamber where it will be processed(edited)

Kezzera 2025-07-30 02:15 p.m.

You're welcome

Kezzera 2025-07-30 02:15 p.m.

I'm closing this now

Nicklaus 2025-07-30 02:51 p.m.

Lmfaooo

Nicklaus used

/transcript

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-30 02:51 p.m.

Creating transcript..

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-30 02:52 p.m.

https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1329678726383927409/1400189231200210974 Successfully created transcript.

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-30 02:52 p.m.

Channel Permissions Synced

Permissions have been synced to Volume IX.

Exported 1075 messages